Vinotemp International Corporation v. LA Crosse Technology, Ltd

Filing 10

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: STATUS OF CIVIL ACTION by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Plaintiff may discharge this order by filing a statement (not to exceed 3 pages)regarding the status of the action plus proof of service of process by or before December 2,2014. (See Order for further details.) (sbou)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 14-6113 MRW Title Vinotemp International v. LA Crosse Technology Present: The Honorable Date November 21, 2014 Michael R. Wilner Veronica McKamie n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant: None present None present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: STATUS OF CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff filed this civil action on August 4, 2014. The case was randomly assigned to Judge Wilner through the Court’s Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. The program sets important deadlines by which the parties must decide whether or not to consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. A precursor to these deadlines is timely service of the summons and complaint on all parties. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), Plaintiff is required to serve process in this action within 120 days of commencement of the action, or by December 2, 2014. However, according to the Court’s review of the docket, no proof of service has been filed in the action yet, and no defendant has appeared in the action to date. In order to properly administer the Direct Assignment Program and advance this action in compliance with this Court’s deadlines, Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute or returned to the civil wheel for reassignment to a District Judge. Plaintiff may discharge this order by filing a statement (not to exceed 3 pages) regarding the status of the action plus proof of service of process by or before December 2, 2014. If no timely submission is filed, the Court will enter an appropriate order that may include sanctions against Plaintiff’s attorney pursuant to Rule 11. CV-90 (10/08) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?