Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Hu Ko Ching et al

Filing 40

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge William D. Keller, GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT AGAINST HU KO CHING and JOE HSIN CHING,individually and d/b/a SPORTSMAN RESTAURANT 39 . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff JOE H AND PROMOTIONS, INC., and Defendants HU KO CHING and JOE HSIN CHING, individually and d/b/a SPORTSMAN RESTAURANT, that the above-entitleddefendant is hereby dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that provided no Party referenced above has filed a motion to reopen this action by December 2, 2015, the dismissal shall be deemed to be with prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6., Hu Ko Ching (individually and ) and Joe Hsin Ching (individually and) terminated. (shb)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Thomas P. Riley, SBN 194706
LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS P. RILEY, P.C.
First Library Square
1114 Fremont Avenue
South Pasadena, CA 91030-3227

JS-6

Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10
11

Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.,
Plaintiff,

12

vs.

13
14

Hu Ko Ching, et al.,

15

Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:14-cv-06123-WDK-E
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT AGAINST HU KO
CHING and JOE HSIN CHING,
individually and d/b/a SPORTSMAN
RESTAURANT

16
17

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff JOE HAND

18
19

PROMOTIONS, INC., and Defendants HU KO CHING and JOE HSIN CHING,

20

individually and d/b/a SPORTSMAN RESTAURANT, that the above-entitled

21

defendant is hereby dismissed without prejudice.

22

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that provided no Party referenced above

23

has filed a motion to reopen this action by December 2, 2015, the dismissal shall be

24

deemed to be with prejudice.

25

///

26

///

27

///
28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Case No. 2:14-cv-06123-WDK-E
PAGE 1

1
2

This dismissal is made pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1).
Each Party referenced-above shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

3
4
5
6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED:

9
10
11
12

________________________________
The Honorable William D. Keller
United States District Court
Central District of California

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

///
///

23
24
25

///
///

26
27

///

28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Case No. 2:14-cv-06123-WDK-E
PAGE 2

Dated:

10/26/15