MacKenzie T. Morgan et al v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Filing
7
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Margaret A. Nagle re Order To Show Cause re potential dismissal. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 12/29/2014. (ec)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
CV 14-6165-ODW-MAN
Title
MacKenzie T. Morgan v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Present: The Honorable
Date
December 9, 2014
MARGARET A. NAGLE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Earlene Carson
Deputy Clerk
N/A
Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
N/A
N/A
Proceedings:
(In Chambers) Order
Plaintiff filed a Complaint For Judicial Review Of Decision Of Commissioner Of Social Security on
August 12, 2014. In paragraph I of its August 12, 2014 Case Management Order, the Court ordered
plaintiff to promptly serve the summons and complaint on the Commissioner and to file a Proof of
Service, showing compliance with the Order, within 28 days after filing the Complaint. The Order
warned plaintiff that failure to comply could result in dismissal of the case. The Court’s review of the
file indicates that, to date, plaintiff has not filed a Proof of Service and 119 days have elapsed since the
filing of the Complaint.
Accordingly, on or before December 29, 2014, plaintiff’s counsel is ORDERED TO SHOW GOOD
CAUSE, why no Proof of Service has been filed and why this case should not be dismissed for lack of
diligent prosecution and failure to comply with the Court’s prior Order. In lieu of responding to this
Order to Show Cause, plaintiff may file the required proof of service.
Plaintiff is expressly cautioned that her failure to timely respond to this Order could result in a
recommendation to dismiss this action for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)
and Local Rule 41-1.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
:
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (10/08)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
efc
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?