Sheila Dawn Schultz v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Filing
21
JUDGMENT OF REMAND by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. The Court, having approved the parties' Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment ("Stipulation to Remand" ) lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. Related to: Order to Remand Case to US Agency 20 , Stipulation to Remand Case to US Agency 19 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (kl)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
STEPHANIE YONEKURA
Acting United States Attorney
LEON W. WEIDMAN
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Civil Division
LYNN M. HARADA [C.S.B.N. 267616]
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration, Region IX
160 Spear St., Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: 415-977-8977
Facsimile: 415-744-0134
e-mail: Lynn.Harada@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
12
13
14
15
SHEILA DAWN SCHULTZ,
Plaintiff,
vs.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JS-6
) No. 2:14-cv-06380-JEM
) JUDGMENT OF REMAND
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social
Security,
Defendant.
_______________________________
The Court, having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand
Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment
(“Stipulation to Remand”) lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within Judgment
of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the
above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further
proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand.
DATED: April 14, 2015
HON. JOHN E. MCDERMOTT
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?