Sheila Dawn Schultz v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Filing 21

JUDGMENT OF REMAND by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. The Court, having approved the parties' Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment ("Stipulation to Remand" ) lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. Related to: Order to Remand Case to US Agency 20 , Stipulation to Remand Case to US Agency 19 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (kl)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 STEPHANIE YONEKURA Acting United States Attorney LEON W. WEIDMAN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Division LYNN M. HARADA [C.S.B.N. 267616] Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration, Region IX 160 Spear St., Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415-977-8977 Facsimile: 415-744-0134 e-mail: Lynn.Harada@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 12 13 14 15 SHEILA DAWN SCHULTZ, Plaintiff, vs. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JS-6 ) No. 2:14-cv-06380-JEM ) JUDGMENT OF REMAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. _______________________________ The Court, having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment (“Stipulation to Remand”) lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. DATED: April 14, 2015 HON. JOHN E. MCDERMOTT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?