Pamela Tinky Mnyandu v. County of Los Angeles et al

Filing 141

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Dale S. Fischer: IT IS ORDERED that the motions to dismiss of defendants Schneider and Arocha are GRANTED and that plaintiff's claim for malicious prosecution as to defendants Schnieder and Arocha is dismissed without leave to amend. The Court having resolved all pending motions to dismiss the First Amended Complaint, plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order within which to file a Second Amended Complaint that cures the deficiencies the Court previously found with respect to the following claims and following parties: (see attached) (jm)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 22 ) CASE NO. CV 14-6485 DSF (FFM) ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, Plaintiff, ) CONCLUSIONS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF v. ) UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ) OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ) ATTORNEY, DDA ANTHONY ) COLANNINO, VITTORIO ) RACOWASKI, THE SCHOOL ) BOARD OF THE LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, JOHN ) ) MCLAUGHLIN, ANA GRAY, ) MARICIO AROCHA, AIDA ) CROOSTHWAITE, JOAN SCHNEIDER, CHARLIE HILL, LOS ) ) ANGLES UNIFIED SCHOOL ) DISTRICT SEDGWICK CMS, JEFFREY ROSE, LESLIE LUNSWAY ) ) and DOES 1-10, ) Defendants. ) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all the records 23 and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 24 Re Motions to Dismiss of Defendants Joan Schneider and Mauricio Arocha. Plaintiff 25 has not filed any written Objections to the Report. The Court concurs with and accepts 26 the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 27 /// 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 28 PAMELA TINKY MNYANDU, 1 IT IS ORDERED that the motions to dismiss of defendants Schneider and Arocha 2 are GRANTED and that plaintiff’s claim for malicious prosecution as to defendants 3 Schnieder and Arocha is dismissed without leave to amend. 4 The Court having resolved all pending motions to dismiss the First Amended 5 Complaint, plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order within which to file a 6 Second Amended Complaint that cures the deficiencies the Court previously found with 7 respect to the following claims and following parties: 8 (1) The First Claim for relief as to defendants Hill, Rose, Lunsway and Sedgwick; 9 (2) The First, Second, and Third Claims for relief as to defendants Colannino and 10 Racowschi for actions not taken as prosecutors; 11 (3) The Second Claim for relief as to defendant Sedgwick; 12 (4) The Fourth Claim for relief as to defendants Sedgwick, Rose, and Lunsway; 13 14 15 and (5) The Monell Claim against County of Los Angeles for actions taken by County employees other than employees of the Office of the District Attorney. 16 17 10/23/15 DATED: 18 19 DALE S. FISCHER United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?