Pamela Tinky Mnyandu v. County of Los Angeles et al
Filing
207
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Dale S. Fischer: (see attached) (jm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., )
)
)
Defendants.
)
PAMELA TINKY MYANDU,
No. CV 14-6485 DSF (FFM)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this
17
action, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Re
18
Motions to Dismiss and Motion to Strike Second Amended Complaint (“Report”), and
19
the objections thereto. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and accepts the
20
findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after
21
having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed.
22
IT IS ORDERED that: (1) The motion to dismiss of defendant County of Los
23
Angeles is GRANTED; plaintiff’s claims against County of Los Angeles are dismissed
24
with prejudice; (2) The motion to dismiss of defendant Charlie Hill is GRANTED;
25
plaintiff’s claims against Hill are dismissed with prejudice; (3) The motion to dismiss
26
plaintiff’s §1983 claim of defendants Sedgwick CMS, Inc. (“Sedgwick”), Jeffrey Rose,
27
and Leslie Lunsway is GRANTED as to Sedgwick and DENIED as to Rose and
28
Lunsway; plaintiff’s §1983 claim is dismissed with prejudice as to Sedgwick; and (4)
1
2
plaintiff’s claims against defendant John McLaughlin are dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Strike plaintiff’s “common law”
3
California state law tort claim for malicious prosecution, brought by defendants
4
Sedgwick, Rose, and Lunsway pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP laws, is DENIED
5
without prejudice.
6
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that remaining defendants Anthony Colannino,
7
Vittorio Racowaschi, Sedgwick, Rose, and Lunsway file answers to the Second
8
Amended Complaint within 20 days of the date hereof.
9
10
8/19/16
DATED:
11
DALE S. FISCHER
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?