Pamela Tinky Mnyandu v. County of Los Angeles et al

Filing 235

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH DISCOVERY ORDER AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (see attached) Response to Order to Show Cause due by 3/19/2017. (jm)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.

CV 14-6485 DSF (FFM)

Title

Pamela Tinky Mnyandu v. County of Los Angeles, et al.

Present: The Honorable

Date

February 27, 2017

Frederick F. Mumm, United States Magistrate Judge

James Munoz

N/A

N/A

Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter / Recorder

Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

None present

None present

Proceedings:

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH DISCOVERY ORDER AND FAILURE
TO PROSECUTE

On December 14, 2016, the Court issued an order granting motions to compel filed
by defendants Colannino and Racowschi. The Court ordered plaintiff to respond to the
discovery in question within 20 days of the order’s date. (Docket No. 222.) On
December 27, 2016, plaintiff moved to vacate the Court’s order. (Docket No. 225.) On
January 26, 2017, the Court denied plaintiff’s motion, but extended the deadline for
plaintiff to respond to the discovery to 20 days from the order’s date. (Docket No. 233.)
The final day for plaintiff to respond to Colannino’s and Racowschi’s discovery
was February 15, 2017. On February 24, 2017, counsel for defendants filed a declaration
attesting that plaintiff had failed to respond to the discovery. (Docket No. 234.)
Accordingly, plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE within 20 days hereof why this
action should not be dismissed under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2)(A)(v)
and 41(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

:
Initials of Preparer

CV-90 (06/04)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

JM

Page 1 of 1