Pamela Tinky Mnyandu v. County of Los Angeles et al

Filing 289

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Dale S. Fischer for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 281 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to all Plaintiff's clai ms against Defendants' Sedgwick, Lunsway & Rose 258 . IT IS ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment as to all plaintiff's claims against defendants Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., Leslie Lunsway, and Jeffrey Rose (the "Sedgwick Defendants") is granted; and (2) all of plaintiff's claims against the Sedgwick Defendants are dismissed with prejudice. (hr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) PAMELA TINKY MNYANDU, No. CV 14-6485 DSF (FFM) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this 17 action, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (the 18 “Report”), and the objections thereto. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with 19 and accepts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in 20 the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which 21 objections were directed. 22 IT IS ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment as to all plaintiff’s 23 claims against defendants Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., Leslie 24 Lunsway, and Jeffrey Rose (the “Sedgwick Defendants”) is granted; and (2) all of 25 plaintiff’s claims against the Sedgwick Defendants are dismissed with prejudice. 26 DATED: 3/19/18 27 28 DALE S. FISCHER United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?