Mighty Enterprises, Inc. v. She Hong Industrial Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 177

**NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT** JUDGMENT AFTER TRIALby Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, in favor of Mighty Enterprises, Inc. against She Hong Industrial Co. Ltd. See document for further information. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lwag)

JS-6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

MIGHTY ENTERPRISES, INC. dba
13 MIGHTY USA,
Plaintiff,

14
15

Case No.: 14-CV-06516-JCG
Hon. Jay C. Gandhi
JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL

v.

16 SHE HONG INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD.,
and DOES 1 through 10,
17
Defendants.
18

NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT

19
20

This action came on regularly for trial between November 14, 2016, and

21 November 18, 2016, in Courtroom 790 of this United States District Court, the
22 Honorable Jay C. Gandhi presiding. The plaintiff, Mighty Enterprises, Inc.
23 (“Mighty”), appeared by attorneys John Shaeffer, Christina Chen, and Amanda
24 Murray of Fox Rothschild LLP. Defendant, She Hong Industrial Co. Ltd., appeared
25 by attorneys Anthony Dain, Kathy Knudsen, and Frederick Taylor of Procopio, Cory,
26 Hargreaves & Savitch LLP.
27

A jury of eight persons was regularly empaneled and sworn. Witnesses

28 were sworn and testified. After hearing the evidence and arguments of counsel,
JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL

1

the jury was duly instructed by the Court and the case was submitted to the jury. The

2

jury deliberated and thereafter returned verdicts as follows:

3
4

Did Plaintiff, Mighty Enterprises, Inc. (“Mighty), prove by a preponderance of

5

the evidence that Defendant, She Hong Industrial Co. Ltd. (“She Hong”), is liable to

6

Mighty for breach of oral contract?

7

_____X_____Yes

8

Did Mighty prove by a preponderance of the evidence that She Hong is liable to

9

___________ No

Mighty for breach of implied contract?

10

_____X_____Yes

___________ No

11

Did Mighty prove by a preponderance of the evidence that She Hong is liable to

12 Mighty for interference with contractual business relations?
13

_____X_____Yes

___________ No

14

Did Mighty prove by a preponderance of the evidence that She Hong is liable to

15 Mighty for fraud?
16

_____X_____Yes

___________ No

17

What is the total amount of Mighty’s damages caused by She Hong?

18

$6,203,000.00

19

Did Mighty prove with clear and convincing evidence that She Hong engaged

20 in malice, oppression or fraud?
21

_____X_____Yes

___________ No

22

What amount, if any, do you award plaintiff, Mighty Enterprises, Inc., in

23 punitive damages?
24

$6,000,000.00

25
26

Now, therefore, pursuant to Rules 54 and 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil

27 Procedure, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that final
28 judgment in the action be entered as follows:
JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL

1

On the claims of breach of oral contract, breach of implied contract,

2

interference with contractual business relations, and fraud: Judgment is entered in

3

favor of Mighty Enterprises, Inc. and against Defendant She Hong Industrial Co. Ltd.

4

in the amount of $12,203,000.00, plus post-judgment interest accruing pursuant to

5

28 U.S.C. § 1961, together with costs as provided by law.

6
7
8

Dated: November 28, 2016
Honorable Jay C. Gandhi
United States Magistrate Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JUDGMENT AFTER TRIAL