Builders Bank v. Oreland, LLC et al
Filing
81
ORDER RE DISMISSAL by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Having considered the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice 80 filed by Plaintiff Builders Bank and Defendants Oreland, LLC, Tierraview, LLC and Richard Paek (collectively, the "Parties") , and good cause existing therefor; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter shall be dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the terms of the settlement agreement executed between the Parties, with the Parties to bear their own fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (jy)
1
2
JS-6
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BUILDERS BANK, an Illinois
Corporation,
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:14-06548 DDP (SHx)
ORDER RE DISMISSAL
vs.
ORELAND, LLC, a California Limited
Liability Company; TIERRAVIEW,
LLC, a California Limited Liability
Company; RICHARD PAEK aka
RICHARD J. PAEK, an individual,
17
Discovery Cutoff: May 9, 2016
Motion Cutoff:
July 25, 2016
Trial Date:
January 31, 2017
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
(PROPOSED) ORDER RE DISMISSAL
CASE NO. 2:14-06548 DDP (SHX)
PROPOSED ORDER RE DISMISSAL.DOCX
1
Having considered the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice filed by
2
Plaintiff Builders Bank and Defendants Oreland, LLC, Tierraview, LLC and Richard
3
Paek (collectively, the “Parties”), and good cause existing therefor;
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter shall be dismissed with prejudice
5
in accordance with the terms of the settlement agreement executed between the
6
Parties, with the Parties to bear their own fees and costs.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
11
DATED: September 30, 2016
12
13
Honorable Dean D. Pregerson
U.S. District Court Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
(PROPOSED) ORDER RE DISMISSAL
CASE NO. 2:14-06548 DDP (SHX)
PROPOSED ORDER RE DISMISSAL.DOCX
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?