Builders Bank v. Oreland, LLC et al

Filing 81

ORDER RE DISMISSAL by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Having considered the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice 80 filed by Plaintiff Builders Bank and Defendants Oreland, LLC, Tierraview, LLC and Richard Paek (collectively, the "Parties") , and good cause existing therefor; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter shall be dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the terms of the settlement agreement executed between the Parties, with the Parties to bear their own fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (jy)

Download PDF
1 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BUILDERS BANK, an Illinois Corporation, 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:14-06548 DDP (SHx) ORDER RE DISMISSAL vs. ORELAND, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company; TIERRAVIEW, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company; RICHARD PAEK aka RICHARD J. PAEK, an individual, 17 Discovery Cutoff: May 9, 2016 Motion Cutoff: July 25, 2016 Trial Date: January 31, 2017 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 (PROPOSED) ORDER RE DISMISSAL CASE NO. 2:14-06548 DDP (SHX) PROPOSED ORDER RE DISMISSAL.DOCX 1 Having considered the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice filed by 2 Plaintiff Builders Bank and Defendants Oreland, LLC, Tierraview, LLC and Richard 3 Paek (collectively, the “Parties”), and good cause existing therefor; 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter shall be dismissed with prejudice 5 in accordance with the terms of the settlement agreement executed between the 6 Parties, with the Parties to bear their own fees and costs. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 11 DATED: September 30, 2016 12 13 Honorable Dean D. Pregerson U.S. District Court Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 (PROPOSED) ORDER RE DISMISSAL CASE NO. 2:14-06548 DDP (SHX) PROPOSED ORDER RE DISMISSAL.DOCX

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?