Helo Energy, LLC v. Sand Canyon of Tehachapi, LLC et al
Filing
102
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar re Proposed Stipulated Protective Order 101 . (See document for complete details) (afe)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
A Limited Liability Partnership
Including Professional Corporations
JOHN A. YACOVELLE, Cal. Bar No. 131781
MARISA B. MILLER, Cal. Bar No. 270860
12275 El Camino Real, Suite 200
San Diego, California 92130
Telephone: 858-720-8900
Facsimile: 858-509-3691
JONATHAN D. MOSS, Cal. Bar No. 252376
333 South Hope Street, 48th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071-1448
Telephone: 213-620-1780
Facsimile: 213-620-1398
E-mail:
jyacovelle@sheppardmullin.com
mmiller@sheppardmullin.com
jmoss@sheppardmullin.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Cross-Defendants
HELO ENERGY, LLC, SAND CANYON OF
TEHACHAPI, LLC, SAUGATUCK ENERGY, LLC
and DAVID MURPHY
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
HELO ENERGY LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company, SAND
CANYON OF TEHACHAPI, LLC, a
California limited liability company,
and SAUGATUCK ENERGY, LLC, a
Connecticut limited liability company,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JEFREY HOGGAN, an individual,
KENT A. HOGGAN, an individual,
HEATHER K. KANN, an individual,
DAVID L. PITCHER, a/k/a “David
Lawrence,” an individual, EAGLE
ENERGY, LLC, a Utah limited
liability company, GLJ, LLC, a Utah
limited liability company,
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
COMPANY, a California corporation,
and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Defendants.
Case No. CV14-06648-DSF (ASx)
Assigned to Hon. Alka Sagar for
Purposes of Discovery
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND
DEFENDANTS
Complaint Filed: March 28, 2012
FAC Filed:
July 24, 2014
Notice of Removal
Filed:
August 25, 2014
28
SMRH:.1
\LA - 063796/000134 - 1105070 v1
STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
GLJ, LLC, a Utah limited liability
company,
Cross-Complainant,
v.
HELO ENERGY, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company, SAND
CANYON OF TEHACHAPI, LLC, a
California limited liability company,
SAUGATUCK ENERGY, LLC, a
Connecticut limited liability company,
RAR ENERGY CONSULTING, LLC,
a California limited liability company,
FISHCREEK CAPITAL FUNDING
L.P., a business entity of form
unknown, and ROES 1 through 50,
inclusive,
Cross-Defendants.
EAGLE ENERGY, LLC, a Utah
limited liability company,
Cross-Complainant,
v.
RUDY SAENZ, an individual, DAVID
MURPHY, an individual, MIKE
CLARY, an individual, LIGHTWAVE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
LIGHTWAVE ENERGY, LLC, HELO
ENERGY, LLC f/k/a SAN CANYON
HOLDCO, LLC a/k/a SC HOLDCO,
LLC, SAUGATUCK ENERGY, LLC,
RAR CONSULTING, LLC,
RICHARD REDOGLIA, an individual,
DYNAMIC ENERGY PARTNERS,
LLC, GLJ, LLC, HEATHER KANN,
an individual, and ROES 1 through 50,
inclusive,
Cross-Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SMRH:.1
\LA - 063796/000134 - 1105070 v1
STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
Plaintiffs and Cross-Defendants Helo Energy, LLC, Sand Canyon of
2
3
Tehachapi, LLC, Saugatuck Energy, LLC and David Murphy (“Plaintiffs”) and
4
Defendants and Cross-Complainants Jefrey Hoggan, Kent Hoggan, Eagle Energy,
5
LLC, Heather Kann, David Pitcher, and GLJ, LLC (“Defendants”) (collectively, the
6
“Parties”), by and through their undersigned attorneys, and subject to the approval
7
of the Court, hereby stipulate and agree that the following Stipulated Protective
8
Order (“Stipulated Protective Order” or “Order”) shall govern the designation,
9
disclosure and use of confidential information, documents and things produced in
10
11
this case.
1.
A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS
Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential,
12
13
proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public
14
disclosure and use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be
15
warranted. Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to
16
enter the following Order. The Parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer
17
blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the
18
protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited
19
information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under applicable legal
20
principles. The Parties further acknowledge that this Order does not entitle them to
21
file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the
22
procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party
23
seeks permission from the Court to file material under seal.
24
B. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT
25
This action is likely to involve trade secrets and other valuable research,
26
development, commercial, financial, technical and/or proprietary information for
27
which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other
28
SMRH:.1
\LA - 063796/000134 - 1105070 v1
-1-
STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
than prosecution of this action is warranted. This action will also involve
2
confidential information produced by the California Independent System Operator
3
Corporation (“CAISO”), including but not limited to information that may meet the
4
definition of “Critical Energy Infrastructure Information” pursuant to 18 CFR
5
§388.113, et seq. Such confidential and proprietary materials and information
6
consist of, among other things, confidential business or financial information,
7
critical energy infrastructure information, information regarding confidential
8
business practices, or other confidential research, development, or commercial
9
information (including information implicating privacy rights of third parties),
10
information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be
11
privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes,
12
court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of
13
information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of
14
discovery materials, to adequately protect information the Parties are entitled to
15
keep confidential, to ensure that the Parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses
16
of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their
17
handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order
18
for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the Parties that
19
information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that
20
nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a
21
confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part
22
of the public record of this case.
23
2.
DEFINITIONS
2.1
24
“Action”: This pending lawsuit and any subsequent proceedings
25
between any of the Parties and Southern California Edison (“SCE”) concerning the
26
Power Purchase and Sale Agreement at issue in this lawsuit, including but not limited
27
to any mediation and/or arbitration with SCE.
2.2
28
SMRH:.1
“Challenging Party”: A Party or Non-Party that challenges the
-2-
STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
designation of information or items under this Order.
2.3
2
“CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: Information (regardless of
3
how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for
4
protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in
5
the Good Cause Statement.
2.4
6
7
their support staff).
2.5
8
9
10
“Counsel”: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as
“Designating Party”: A Party or Non-Party that designates
information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as
“CONFIDENTIAL.”
2.6
11
“Disclosure or Discovery Material”: All items or information,
12
regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained
13
(including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are
14
produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter.
2.7
15
“Expert”: A person with specialized knowledge or experience in a
16
matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to
17
serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action.
2.8
18
“House Counsel”: Attorneys who are employees of a party to this
19
Action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other
20
outside counsel.
21
2.9
22
“Non-Party”: Any natural person, partnership, corporation,
association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action.
2.10 “Outside Counsel of Record”: Attorneys who are not employees of a
23
24
party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and
25
have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm
26
which has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff.
2.11 “Party”: Any party to this Action, including all of its officers,
27
28
directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record
SMRH:.1
-3-
STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
(and their support staffs).
2.12 “Producing Party”: A Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or
2
3
Discovery Material in this Action.
4
2.13 “Professional Vendors”: Persons or entities that provide litigation
5
support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or
6
demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium)
7
and their employees and subcontractors.
2.14 “Protected Material”: Any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is
8
9
designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.”
2.15 “Receiving Party”: A Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery
10
11
Material from a Producing Party.
12
3.
SCOPE
13
The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only
14
Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or
15
extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or
16
compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or
17
presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material.
Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the
18
19
trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial.
20
4.
DURATION
Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations
21
22
imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees
23
otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be
24
deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this Action,
25
with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and
26
exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this Action,
27
including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time
28
pursuant to applicable law.
SMRH:.1
-4-
STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
5.
DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL
5.1
2
Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection.
3
Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under
4
this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that
5
qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for
6
protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written
7
communications that qualify so that other portions of the material, documents,
8
items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept
9
unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order.
Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations
10
11
that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper
12
purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber the case development process or to
13
impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the
14
Designating Party to sanctions.
15
If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it
16
designated for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must
17
promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the inapplicable designation.
5.2
18
Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in
19
this Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise
20
stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection
21
under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or
22
produced.
23
Designation in conformity with this Order requires:
24
(a)
for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic
25
documents, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial
26
proceedings), that the Producing Party affix at a minimum, the legend
27
“CONFIDENTIAL” (hereinafter “CONFIDENTIAL legend”), to each page that
28
contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page
SMRH:.1
-5-
STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected
2
portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).
3
A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents available for inspection
4
need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated
5
which documents it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and
6
before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be
7
deemed “CONFIDENTIAL.” After the inspecting Party has identified the
8
documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine
9
which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order.
10
Then, before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the
11
“CONFIDENTIAL legend” to each page that contains Protected Material. If only a
12
portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing
13
Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making
14
appropriate markings in the margins).
(b)
15
for testimony given in depositions that the Designating Party identify
16
the Disclosure or Discovery Material on the record, before the close of the
17
deposition all protected testimony.
(c)
18
for information produced in some form other than documentary and
19
for any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on
20
the exterior of the container or containers in which the information is stored the
21
legend “CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a portion or portions of the information
22
warrants protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the
23
protected portion(s).
5.3
24
Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent
25
failure to designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive
26
the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such
27
material. Upon timely correction of a designation, the Receiving Party must make
28
reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the
SMRH:.1
-6-
STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
provisions of this Order.
2
6.
CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS
6.1
3
Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a
4
designation of confidentiality at any time that is consistent with the Court’s
5
Scheduling Order.
6
7
6.2
Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute
resolution process under Local Rule 37.1 et seq.
8
6.3
The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on
9
the Designating Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper
10
purpose (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other
11
parties) may expose the Challenging Party to sanctions. Unless the Designating
12
Party has waived or withdrawn the confidentiality designation, all parties shall
13
continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is
14
entitled under the Producing Party’s designation until the Court rules on the
15
challenge.
16
7.
17
ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
7.1
Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is
18
disclosed or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this
19
Action only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this Action. Such
20
Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the
21
conditions described in this Order. When the Action has been terminated, a
22
Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 13 below (FINAL
23
DISPOSITION).
24
Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a
25
location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons
26
authorized under this Order.
27
7.2
Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless
28
SMRH:.1
-7-
STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a
2
Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated
3
“CONFIDENTIAL” only to:
4
(a)
the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this Action, as
5
well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably
6
necessary to disclose the information for this Action;
7
(b)
the officers, directors, employees (including House Counsel) and
8
consultants of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for
9
this Action;
10
c)
Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom
11
disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have signed the
12
“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);
13
(d)
the court and its personnel;
14
(e)
court reporters and their staff;
15
(f)
professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and Professional
16
Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action;
17
18
(g)
the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a
custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information;
19
(h)
during their depositions, witnesses ,and attorneys for witnesses, in the
20
Action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary provided: (1) the deposing
21
party requests that the witness sign the form attached as Exhibit A hereto; and
22
(2) they will not be permitted to keep any confidential information unless they sign
23
the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), unless otherwise
24
agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of transcribed
25
deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material may
26
be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone
27
except as permitted under this Order; and
28
SMRH:.1
-8-
STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
(i)
1
2
mutually agreed upon by any of the parties engaged in settlement discussions.
8.
3
4
any mediator or settlement officer, and their supporting personnel,
PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED
PRODUCED IN OTHER LITIGATION
If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation
5
6
that compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this Action as
7
“CONFIDENTIAL,” that Party must:
(a)
8
9
promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification
shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order;
(b)
10
promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order
11
to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the
12
subpoena or order is subject to this Order. Such notification shall include a copy of
13
this Stipulated Protective Order; and
(c)
14
15
cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be
pursued by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.
If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with
16
17
the subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this
18
action as “CONFIDENTIAL” before a determination by the court from which the
19
subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party’s
20
permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking
21
protection in that court of its confidential material and nothing in these provisions
22
should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this Action
23
to disobey a lawful directive from another court.
24
9.
25
PRODUCED IN THIS LITIGATION
A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE
(a)
26
The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a
27
Non-Party in this Action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Such information
28
produced by Non-Parties in connection with this litigation is protected by the
SMRH:.1
-9-
STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
remedies and relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these provisions should be
2
construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional protections.
(b)
3
In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to
4
produce a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is
5
subject to an agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s
6
confidential information, then the Party shall:
(1)
7
promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-
8
Party that some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality
9
agreement with a Non-Party;
10
(2)
promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated
11
Protective Order in this Action, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably
12
specific description of the information requested; and
(3)
13
14
make the information requested available for inspection by the
Non-Party, if requested.
(c)
15
If the Non-Party fails to seek a protective order from this court within
16
14 days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party
17
may produce the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery
18
request. If the Non-Party timely seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall
19
not produce any information in its possession or control that is subject to the
20
confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a determination by the court.
21
Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the burden and
22
expense of seeking protection in this court of its Protected Material.
23
10.
UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed
24
25
Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this
26
Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in
27
writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best
28
efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the
SMRH:.1
-10-
STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of
2
this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment
3
and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
4
11.
5
PROTECTED MATERIAL
INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE
When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain
6
7
inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other
8
protection, the obligations of the Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal
9
Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This provision is not intended to modify
10
whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for
11
production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence
12
502(d) and (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure
13
of a communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work
14
product protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated
15
protective order submitted to the court.
16
12.
12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any
17
18
MISCELLANEOUS
person to seek its modification by the Court in the future.
12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this
19
20
Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or
21
producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated
22
Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground to
23
use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective Order.
24
12.3 Filing Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any
25
Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. Protected Material
26
may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the
27
specific Protected Material at issue. If a Party's request to file Protected Material
28
under seal is denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the information
SMRH:.1
-11-
STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
in the public record unless otherwise instructed by the court.
12.4 Modification. The provisions of this Order may be modified at any
2
3
time by stipulation of the parties and approval by order of this Court, or upon
4
Motion for good cause shown.
5
13.
FINAL DISPOSITION
After the final disposition of this Action, as defined in paragraph 4, within 60
6
7
days of a written request by the Designating Party, each Receiving Party must
8
return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such material. As
9
used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts,
10
compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the
11
Protected Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the
12
Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if
13
not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the 60 day deadline that
14
(1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was
15
returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any
16
copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or
17
capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel
18
are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial,
19
deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition
20
and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work product, and consultant and expert
21
work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such
22
archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this
23
Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION).
24
14.
25
measures including, without limitation, contempt proceedings and/or monetary
26
sanctions.
Any violation of this Order may be punished by any and all appropriate
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
27
28
SMRH:.1
-12-
STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
Dated:
August 25, 2015
2
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER &
HAMPTON LLP
3
By: /s/ Jonathan D. Moss
JOHN A. YACOVELLE
MARISA B. MILLER
JONATHAN D. MOSS
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and CrossDefendants
HELO ENERGY, LLC, SAND
CANYON OF TEHACHAPI, LLC,
SAUGATUCK ENERGY, LLC and
DAVID MURPHY
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Dated:
August 25, 2015
11
SNOW, CHRISTENSEN &
MARTINEAU
12
By: /s/ Samuel Alba
SAMUEL ALBA
RODNEY R. PARKER
Attorneys for Defendant
JEFREY HOGGAN
13
14
15
16
DATED:
August 24, 2015
SAGE LAW PARTNERS
17
18
By: /s/ Ryan M. Nord
RYAN M. NORD
19
Attorneys for Defendants and CrossComplainants
KENT HOGGAN, EAGLE ENERGY,
LLC, HEATHER KANN, DAVID
PITCHER, GLJ, LLC
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SMRH:.1
-13-
STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
Attestation Regarding Signatures
2
3
I, Jonathan D. Moss, attest that all signatories listed, and on whose behalf the
filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing.
4
5
6
DATED: August 25, 2015
7
/s/ Jonathan D. Moss
JONATHAN D. MOSS
8
9
10
11
FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS
SO ORDERED.
Dated: ____________
August 26, 2015
12
/s/
HONORABLE ALKA SAGAR
United States Magistrate Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SMRH:.1
-14-
STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
EXHIBIT A
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
18
HELO ENERGY LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company, SAND
CANYON OF TEHACHAPI, LLC, a
California limited liability company,
and SAUGATUCK ENERGY, LLC, a
Connecticut limited liability company,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JEFREY HOGGAN, an individual,
KENT A. HOGGAN, an individual,
HEATHER K. KANN, an individual,
DAVID L. PITCHER, a/k/a “David
Lawrence,” an individual, EAGLE
ENERGY, LLC, a Utah limited
liability company, GLJ, LLC, a Utah
limited liability company,
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
COMPANY, a California corporation,
and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Defendants.
19
And All Related Cross-Claims.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Case No. CV14-06648-DSF (ASx)
Assigned to Hon. Alka Sagar for
Purposes of Discovery
20
ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND
21
22
23
24
I, (print or type full name) _________________________________,
declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
following statements are true and correct:
25
26
27
28
I reside in _____________ County, in the state of __________. I am employed
by (state name and address of employer) ________________________ as (state
position) _________________________________.
SMRH:.1
-15-
STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
2
1.
of which has been given to me.
3
4
I have read the Stipulated Protective Order in this proceeding, a copy
2.
I understand and agree to comply with and be bound by the provisions
of the Order upon receipt of any “Confidential” information, document, or thing.
5
3.
I will be personally subject to the Order and all of its requirements and
6
procedures, and will be subject to the Court’s jurisdiction for enforcement of the
7
Order.
8
9
10
Executed at _____________________ on this _____ day of _____________,
_____.
11
(Signature)
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SMRH:.1
-16-
STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?