Miguel Arevalo v. Chipotle Services, LLC
Filing
90
JUDGMENT 89 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff Miguel Arevalo take nothing on the claims for relief asserted in his Complaint for Damages. Each Side shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. (lom)
1 MESSNER REEVES, LLP
Charles C. Cavanagh (CA State Bar No. 198468)
2 Adam Royval (Pro Hac Vice)
1430 Wynkoop Street, Suite 300
3
Denver, CO 80202
4 Telephone: (303) 623-1800
Facsimile: (303) 623-0552
5 E-mail: ccavanagh@messner.com
aroyval@messner.com
6
7 Attorneys for Defendant
CHIPOTLE SERVICES, LLC
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
)
)
MIGUEL AREVALO,
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
)
CHIPOTLE SERVICES LLC; JOHN
)
DOE; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
____________________________________ )
Case No. 2:14-CV-06652-CAS-PJW
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
Assigned To:
Judge:
Hon. Christina A. Snyder
Courtroom: 5 (Spring Street)
Trial Date:
May 17-25, 2016
21
22
The parties tried this action to a jury on May 17-25, 2016, Hon. Christina
23 A. Snyder, District Court Judge presiding.
The evidence presented, having
24 been fully considered, the issues having been duly heard, and a jury verdict
25 having been duly rendered, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED
26 / / /
27 / / /
28 / / /
-1JUDGMENT
1
2
that plaintiff Miguel Arevalo take nothing on the claims for relief asserted in his
Complaint for Damages. Each Side shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
3
4
5 Dated: August 23, 2016
6
By:
Hon. Christina A. Snyder
United States District Court Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Submitted by:
August 1, 2016
MESSNER REEVES, LLP
Charles C. Cavanagh
Adam. M. Royval (pro hac vice)
By: _/s/ Charles Cavanagh__
Charles C. Cavanagh
Attorneys for Defendant
CHIPOTLE SERVICES, LLC.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?