Parquet By Dian v. TLT Express Inc et al
Filing
21
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO REMAND CASE TO LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT 16 by Judge George H. King. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED AS FOLLOWS:1. The Stipulation shall be, and hereby is, approved; 2. This matter shall be immediately remanded back to the Los Angeles Superior Court for adjudication. Case remanded to Los Angeles Superior Court, Case number BC551763 Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (lom) Modified on 2/25/2015 (lom). (mailed 2/25/15)
1
JS-6
2
FILED: 2/24/15
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION
10
PARQUET BY DIAN, a California
12 corporation,
Case No.: CV 14-6696-GHK (FFMx)
13
[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING
STIPULATION TO REMAND CASE
TO LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR
COURT
11
14
Plaintiff,
v.
15
TLT EXPRESS, INC., doing business as
TEAM WORLDWIDE, a California
17 corporation, TEAM EXPRESS AIR,
18 INC., doing business as TEAM
WORLDWIDE, a Texas corporation,
19 and Does 1 to 20 inclusive,
16
20
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO REMAND CASE TO LOS ANGELES
SUPERIOR COURT
1
Having considered the Stipulation to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior
2
Court by and between Plaintiff PARQUET BY DIAN (“Plaintiff”), on the one hand,
3
and Defendant TLT EXPRESS, INC., doing business as TEAM WORLDWIDE
4
(“Defendant”), on the other hand, and good cause appearing therefor,
5
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED AS FOLLOWS:
6
1.
The Stipulation shall be, and hereby is, approved;
7
2.
This matter shall be immediately remanded back to the Los Angeles
8
Superior Court for adjudication.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
13
Dated:
2/24/15
______________________________
The Honorable George H. King, Chief
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO REMAND CASE TO LOS ANGELES
SUPERIOR COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?