Gustavo Mendoza v. U.S. Bank National Association

Filing 11

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT 7 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) . (lc) Modified on 9/25/2014 .(lc).

1
2

O

3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GUSTAVO MENDOZA,

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.
U.S. BANK NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION,

15
Defendant.
16
___________________________

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CV 14-06716 DDP (MANx)
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION
TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
[DKT. NO. 7]

17
18

Presently before the Court is Defendant U.S. Bank N.A.’s

19

motion to dismiss Plaintiff Gustavo Mendoza’s complaint. Plaintiff,

20

represented by counsel, has not timely opposed the motion.

21

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion.

22

Central District of California Local Rule 7-9 requires an

23

opposing party to file an opposition to any motion at least twenty-

24

one (21) days prior to the date designated for hearing the motion.

25

C.D. CAL. L.R. 7-9. Additionally, Local Rule 7-12 provides that

26

“[t]he failure to file any required document, or the failure to

27

file it within the deadline, may be deemed consent to the granting

28

or denial of the motion.” C.D. CAL. L.R. 7-12.

1

The hearing on Defendant’s motion was noticed for October 6,

2

2014. Plaintiff’s opposition was therefore due by September 15,

3

2014. As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has not filed an

4

opposition. Accordingly, the Court deems Plaintiff’s failure to

5

oppose as consent to granting the motion to dismiss, and GRANTS the

6

motion.

7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10
11

Dated: September 25, 2014
DEAN D. PREGERSON
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2