Pegasus Imports, LLC v. PT. Wahyu Pradana Binamulia et al

Filing 60

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING REGARDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 39 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Parties should limit their arguments to ten pages, exclusive of exhibits and evidentiary support. To the extent that parties rely on evidence previously submitted, citations to the record will suffice. Simultaneous submissions are due October 15, 2015. All other dates and deadlines in this action REMAIN on calendar. (iv)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court Central District of California 8 9 10 11 PEGASUS IMPORTS, LLC, Plaintiff, 12 13 Case No. 2:14-cv-06843-ODW (AJWx) v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: 14 PT. WAHYU PRADANA BINAMULIA, SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING 15 and DOES 1–50, inclusive, REGARDING MOTION FOR Defendants. 16 17 PT. WAHYU PRADANA BINAMULIA, 18 SUMMARY JUDGMENT [39] and DOES 1–50, inclusive, Counterclaimant, 19 20 v. 21 22 23 PEGASUS IMPORTS, LLC, Counterdefendant. 24 25 To assist the Court in assessing Defendant-Counterclaimant’s Motion for 26 Summary Judgment (ECF No. 39), the Court hereby ORDERS the parties to show 27 cause, in writing, as to any relationship, or lack thereof, that may exist between 28 Plaintiff/Counterdefendant and Affendi Heruyanto (“Heru”), and any relationship, or 1 lack thereof, between Defendant/Counterclaimant and Heru. 2 Parties should limit their arguments to ten pages, exclusive of exhibits and 3 evidentiary support. To the extent that parties rely on evidence previously submitted, 4 citations to the record will suffice. Simultaneous submissions are due October 15, 5 2015. All other dates and deadlines in this action REMAIN on calendar. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 October 1, 2015 10 11 12 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?