Pegasus Imports, LLC v. PT. Wahyu Pradana Binamulia et al
Filing
84
FOURTH ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court sees no need to require a Rule 41 filing before the conditions of theAgreement are met, and hereby ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE, inwriting, by February 22, 2016, why settlement has not been finalized. No hearing will be held. A Rule 41 dismissal filing will be deemed compliance with this Order. (vv)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
United States District Court
Central District of California
8
9
10
11
PEGASUS IMPORTS, LLC,
Plaintiff,
12
13
FOURTH ORDER TO SHOW
v.
14
PT. WAHYU PRADANA BINAMULIA
15
and DOES 1–50, inclusive,
Defendants.
16
17
PT. WAHYU PRADANA BINAMULIA
18
and DOES 1–50, inclusive,
Counterclaimant,
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 2:14-cv-06843-ODW (AJW)
v.
PEGASUS IMPORTS, LLC,
Counterdefendant.
CAUSE RE: SETTLEMENT
1
In light of the Parties’ Joint Statement in response to the Court’s Second Order
2
to Show Cause Re: Settlement (ECF Nos. 82, 83), the Court understands that an
3
Agreement has been reached by the parties and that a dismissal in compliance with
4
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 is pending, but subject to the parties’ agreed-upon
5
terms.
6
The Court sees no need to require a Rule 41 filing before the conditions of the
7
Agreement are met, and hereby ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in
8
writing, by February 22, 2016, why settlement has not been finalized. No hearing will
9
be held. A Rule 41 dismissal filing will be deemed compliance with this Order.
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
January 21, 2016
14
15
16
____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?