Jake Carillo v. City of Los Angeles et al

Filing 47

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell: Plaintiff was ordered to respond to the Court's Order to Show Cause 46 no later than October 9, 2015. No response to the Court's Order has been filed. Accordingly, the Court hereby dismisses the action without prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to respond to the Court's Order to Show Cause. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (cw)

JS-6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.

CV 14-06875 BRO (AJWx)

Title

Jake Carillo v. City of Los Angeles et al

Date

October 15, 2015

Present: The Honorable

BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL, United States District Judge

Cheryl Wynn

Not Present

N/A

Relief Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter

Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present

Not Present

Proceedings:

(IN CHAMBERS)
ORDER RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

Plaintiff filed a Complaint with this Court on September 3, 2015.
On September 28, 2015, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause Re: Lack of
Prosecution in light of the Plaintiff’s apparent failure to prosecute, failure to appear at the
Pretrial Conference, and for failure to comply with the Courts Standing Order and Civil
Jury Trial Order. The Order specifically warned Plaintiff that the Court could dismiss
this action if good cause was not shown for any extension of time. Plaintiff was ordered
to respond to the Court’s Order to Show Cause no later than October 9, 2015. To date,
however, no response to the Court’s Order has been filed with this Court.
Accordingly, the Court hereby dismisses the action without prejudice for lack of
prosecution and for failure to respond to the Court’s Order to Show Cause.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

:
Initials of Preparer

CV-90 (06/04)

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

00

cw

Page 1 of 1