Clyde Dewitt v. Lawrence A. Palcovic et al
Filing
30
ORDER and Stipulation for Protective Order by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick re Stipulation for Protective Order 29 . (sp)
Case 2:14-cv-06894-MWF-E Document 29-1 Filed 08/28/15 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:147
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MARC S. SHAPIRO, SBN 155791
JONATHAN P. CYR SBN 260826
HANGER, STEINBERG, SHAPIRO & ASH
A Law Corporation
21031 Ventura Blvd., Suite 800
Woodland Hills CA 91364-6512
(818)226-1222 Iax (818)226-1215
Attorneys for Defendants
LAWRENCE A. PALKOVIC and DIANE C. PALKOVIC,
(erroneously sued and served as LAWRENCE A. PALCOVIC
and DIANE C. PALCOVIC)
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WESTERN DIVISION
11
12
CLYDE DeWITT, a natural person,
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
VS.
LAWRENCE A. PALCOVIC, and
DIANE C. PALCOVIC, natural pe
Defendants.
17
CASE NO. 2: 14-cv-06894-MWF(Ex)
(Assigned for all purposes to
Hon. Michael W.Fitzgerald, Dept.
160016th Floor)
ORDER RE
STIPULATION AND
PROTECTIVE ORDER
[Stipulation for Protective Order
filed concurrently herewith]
18
19
20
21
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
22
Having considered the Stipulation and Protective Order submitted jointly by
23
Defendants LAWRENCE A. PALKOVIC and DIANE C. PALKOVIC’S
24
(erroneously sued and served as LAWRENCE A. PALCOVIC and DIANE C.
25
PALCOVIC) and Plaintiff CLYDE DeWITT in this matter, and good cause having
26
been shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDRED:
27
I/I
28
I/I
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case 2:14-cv-06894-MWF-E Document 29-1 Filed 08/28/15 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:148
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, The parties’ stipulation for protective order
I
2
is approved and a protective order is entered in accordance with the terms set forth
3
therein.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated:
7
Hon. CHARLES F. EICK
Magistrate Judge of the District Court
8
9
10
197/3303
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?