Clyde Dewitt v. Lawrence A. Palcovic et al

Filing 30

ORDER and Stipulation for Protective Order by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick re Stipulation for Protective Order 29 . (sp)

Download PDF
Case 2:14-cv-06894-MWF-E Document 29-1 Filed 08/28/15 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:147 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MARC S. SHAPIRO, SBN 155791 JONATHAN P. CYR SBN 260826 HANGER, STEINBERG, SHAPIRO & ASH A Law Corporation 21031 Ventura Blvd., Suite 800 Woodland Hills CA 91364-6512 (818)226-1222 Iax (818)226-1215 Attorneys for Defendants LAWRENCE A. PALKOVIC and DIANE C. PALKOVIC, (erroneously sued and served as LAWRENCE A. PALCOVIC and DIANE C. PALCOVIC) 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 CLYDE DeWITT, a natural person, 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, VS. LAWRENCE A. PALCOVIC, and DIANE C. PALCOVIC, natural pe Defendants. 17 CASE NO. 2: 14-cv-06894-MWF(Ex) (Assigned for all purposes to Hon. Michael W.Fitzgerald, Dept. 160016th Floor) ORDER RE STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER [Stipulation for Protective Order filed concurrently herewith] 18 19 20 21 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 22 Having considered the Stipulation and Protective Order submitted jointly by 23 Defendants LAWRENCE A. PALKOVIC and DIANE C. PALKOVIC’S 24 (erroneously sued and served as LAWRENCE A. PALCOVIC and DIANE C. 25 PALCOVIC) and Plaintiff CLYDE DeWITT in this matter, and good cause having 26 been shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDRED: 27 I/I 28 I/I [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:14-cv-06894-MWF-E Document 29-1 Filed 08/28/15 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:148 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, The parties’ stipulation for protective order I 2 is approved and a protective order is entered in accordance with the terms set forth 3 therein. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: 7 Hon. CHARLES F. EICK Magistrate Judge of the District Court 8 9 10 197/3303 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?