J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Jose Gerardo Martinez et al
Filing
29
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge William D. Keller, GRANTING STIPULATION OFDISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANTS JOSE GERARDO MARTINEZ andLYNN LUPE MARTINEZ, individually and d/b/a EL CAMINO REAL 28 . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and betw een Plaintiff J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. and Defendants JOSE GERARDO MARTINEZ and LYNN LUPE MARTINEZ, individually and d/b/a EL CAMINO REAL, that the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed without prejudice against JOSE GERARDO MARTINEZ and LY NN LUPE MARTINEZ, individually and d/b/a EL CAMINO REAL, and subject to the Courts jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement reached between the Parties. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that provided no Party referenced above has filed a motion to reopen this action by December 13, 2015, the dismissal shall be deemed to be withprejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Thomas P. Riley, SBN 194706
LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS P. RILEY, P.C.
First Library Square
1114 Fremont Avenue
South Pasadena, CA 91030-3227
JS-6
Tel: 626-799-9797
Fax: 626-799-9795
TPRLAW@att.net
Attorneys for Plaintiff
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
14
Jose Gerardo Martinez, et al.,
15
CASE NO. 2:14-cv-06988-WDK-PLA
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF
DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANTS
JOSE GERARDO MARTINEZ and
LYNN LUPE MARTINEZ, individually
and d/b/a EL CAMINO REAL
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff J & J SPORTS
PRODUCTIONS, INC. and Defendants JOSE GERARDO MARTINEZ and LYNN LUPE
MARTINEZ, individually and d/b/a EL CAMINO REAL, that the above-entitled action is
hereby dismissed without prejudice against JOSE GERARDO MARTINEZ and LYNN LUPE
MARTINEZ, individually and d/b/a EL CAMINO REAL, and subject to the Court’s jurisdiction
to enforce the settlement agreement reached between the Parties.
23
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that provided no Party referenced above has filed a
24
motion to reopen this action by December 13, 2015, the dismissal shall be deemed to be with
25
prejudice.
26
///
27
///
28
///
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Case No. 2:14-CV-06988-WDK-PLA
PAGE 1
This dismissal is made pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). Each
1
2
Party referenced-above shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED:
7
8
9
10
11
12
________________________________
The Honorable William D. Keller
United States District Court
Central District of California
13
14
///
15
16
17
///
///
18
19
20
21
///
///
///
22
23
///
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Case No. 2:14-CV-06988-WDK-PLA
PAGE 2
Dated:
10/26/15
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?