J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Jose Gerardo Martinez et al

Filing 29

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge William D. Keller, GRANTING STIPULATION OFDISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANTS JOSE GERARDO MARTINEZ andLYNN LUPE MARTINEZ, individually and d/b/a EL CAMINO REAL 28 . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and betw een Plaintiff J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. and Defendants JOSE GERARDO MARTINEZ and LYNN LUPE MARTINEZ, individually and d/b/a EL CAMINO REAL, that the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed without prejudice against JOSE GERARDO MARTINEZ and LY NN LUPE MARTINEZ, individually and d/b/a EL CAMINO REAL, and subject to the Courts jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement reached between the Parties. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that provided no Party referenced above has filed a motion to reopen this action by December 13, 2015, the dismissal shall be deemed to be withprejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Thomas P. Riley, SBN 194706 LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS P. RILEY, P.C. First Library Square 1114 Fremont Avenue South Pasadena, CA 91030-3227 JS-6 Tel: 626-799-9797 Fax: 626-799-9795 TPRLAW@att.net Attorneys for Plaintiff J & J Sports Productions, Inc. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 J & J Sports Productions, Inc. 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 14 Jose Gerardo Martinez, et al., 15 CASE NO. 2:14-cv-06988-WDK-PLA ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANTS JOSE GERARDO MARTINEZ and LYNN LUPE MARTINEZ, individually and d/b/a EL CAMINO REAL Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. and Defendants JOSE GERARDO MARTINEZ and LYNN LUPE MARTINEZ, individually and d/b/a EL CAMINO REAL, that the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed without prejudice against JOSE GERARDO MARTINEZ and LYNN LUPE MARTINEZ, individually and d/b/a EL CAMINO REAL, and subject to the Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement reached between the Parties. 23 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that provided no Party referenced above has filed a 24 motion to reopen this action by December 13, 2015, the dismissal shall be deemed to be with 25 prejudice. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Case No. 2:14-CV-06988-WDK-PLA PAGE 1 This dismissal is made pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). Each 1 2 Party referenced-above shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED: 7 8 9 10 11 12 ________________________________ The Honorable William D. Keller United States District Court Central District of California 13 14 /// 15 16 17 /// /// 18 19 20 21 /// /// /// 22 23 /// 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Case No. 2:14-CV-06988-WDK-PLA PAGE 2 Dated: 10/26/15

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?