Daniel Lopez v. Zubair M. Bholat et al

Filing 57

CERTIFICATION AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE CONTEMPT by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. It is Ordered that Zubair M. Bholat shall appear on 8/29/16, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 1 before the Honorable S. James Otero, U.S. District Judge, and then and there shall show cause, if there be any, why Bholat should not be adjudged in contempt by reason of the facts certified herein. (See document for further details.) (sp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 DANIEL LOPEZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ZUBAIR BHOLAT, et al., ) ) Defendant. ) ) ___________________________________) NO. CV 14-7087-SJO(Ex) CERTIFICATION AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE CONTEMPT 17 18 IT IS ORDERED that Zubair M. Bholat (“Bholat”) shall appear on 19 August 29, 2016, at 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom 1 before the Honorable 20 S. James Otero, United States District Judge, and then and there 21 shall show cause, if there be any, why Bholat should not be adjudged 22 in contempt by reason of the facts certified herein. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 2 In accordance with 28 U.S.C. section 636(e), the Magistrate Judge certifies the following facts:1 3 4 1. On February 5, 2015, this Court entered a Default Judgment 5 against Bholat and in favor of Plaintiff. 6 7 2. 8 Appearance and Examination re: Enforcement of Judgment,” seeking 9 an order that Bholat appear before the Magistrate Judge for a 10 On June 19, 2015, Plaintiff filed an “Application for judgment debtor examination. 11 12 3. On June 24, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued an “Order to 13 Appear for Examination re: Enforcement of Judgment,” requiring 14 that Bholat appear before the Magistrate Judge on August 7, 15 2015, in Courtroom 20 at 9:30 a.m. for a judgment debtor 16 examination. 17 18 4. 19 continuing the judgment debtor examination of Bholat until 20 November 13, 2015, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 20. 21 On August 3, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed an order /// 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1/ The question of whether Bholat should be held in contempt on these certified facts, and the question of the appropriate sanctions to be imposed, if any, are commended to the District Judge for his consideration. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(e); see also Bingman v. Ward, 100 F.3d 653, 658 (9th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1188 (1997); Taberer v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc., 954 F.2d 888, 903-908 (3rd Cir. 1992). The limited contempt powers granted to Magistrate Judges in the “Federal Courts Improvement Act of 2000” do not extend to the circumstances presented in the instant case. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(e). 2 1 5. A proof of service filed by Plaintiff on August 16, 2015, 2 purportedly reflects an August 10, 2015 personal service on 3 Bholat of the Magistrate Judge’s order continuing the judgment 4 debtor examination until November 13, 2015. 5 6 6. On November 13, 2015, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 20, 7 counsel for Plaintiff appeared for Bholat’s examination but 8 Bholat failed to appear at that time and place. 9 10 7. On April 20, 2016, Plaintiff filed another 11 “Application for Appearance and Examination re: Enforcement 12 of Judgment,” seeking another order that Bholat appear 13 before the Magistrate Judge for a judgment debtor 14 examination. 15 16 8. On April 22, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued an 17 “Order to Appear for Examination re: Enforcement of 18 Judgment,” requiring that Bholat appear before the 19 Magistrate Judge on June 24, 2016, in Courtroom 20 at 9:30 20 a.m. for a judgment debtor examination. 21 22 9. 23 purportedly reflects an April 30, 2016 personal service on 24 Bholat of the Magistrate Judge’s “Order to Appear for 25 Examination re: Enforcement of Judgment.” 26 /// 27 /// 28 A proof of service filed by Plaintiff on May 8, 2016, /// 3 1 10. On June 24, 2016, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 20, 2 counsel for Plaintiff appeared for Bholat’s examination but 3 Bholat failed to appear at that time and place. 4 5 DATED: June 27, 2016 6 7 8 9 /S/ CHARLES F. EICK UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?