Bysherrel Fredrick v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 9

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The hearing on Defendant's motion was noticed for November 10, 2014. Plaintiff's opposition was therefore due by October 20, 2014. As of the date of this Order, P laintiff has not filed an opposition or any other filing that could be construed as a request for a continuance. Accordingly, the court deems Plaintiff's failure to oppose a consent to granting the motion to dismiss, and GRANTS the motion. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED,granting 7 Motion to Dismiss (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (See document for further details) (bp)

1
2

O

3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

BYSHERREL FREDERICK,

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; CALWESTERN RECONVEYANCE LLC,

15
Defendants.
16
___________________________

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CV 14-07093 DDP (JCx)
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION
TO DISMISS

[Dkt. 7]

17
18

Presently before the court is Defendant Wells Fargo Bank,

19

N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss.

20

Accordingly, the court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and

21

adopts the following order.

Plaintiff has not opposed the motion.

22

Central District of California Local Rule 7-9 requires an

23

opposing party to file an opposition to any motion at least twenty-

24

one (21) days prior to the date designated for hearing the motion.

25

C.D. CAL. L.R. 7-9.

26

“[t]he failure to file any required document, or the failure to

27

file it within the deadline, may be deemed consent to the granting

28

or denial of the motion.”

Additionally, Local Rule 7-12 provides that

C.D. CAL. L.R. 7-12.

1

The hearing on Defendant’s motion was noticed for November 10,

2

2014.

Plaintiff’s opposition was therefore due by October 20,

3

2014.

As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has not filed an

4

opposition or any other filing that could be construed as a request

5

for a continuance.

6

failure to oppose as consent to granting the motion to dismiss, and

7

GRANTS the motion.

Accordingly, the court deems Plaintiff’s

Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED.

8
9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12
13

Dated: October 28, 2014
DEAN D. PREGERSON
United States District Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2