FCM Capital Partners LLC v. Regent Corporate Consulting Limited et al

Filing 49

ORDER DIMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: the Court hereby DISMISSES the action without prejudice for failure to respond to the Court's March 27, 2017, Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. See order for further details. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (jy)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 FCM CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC, 10 11 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, Case No: 2:14-cv-07099-ODW-MAN ORDER DIMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE v. REGENT CORPORATE CONSULTING LIMITED; REGENT TRUST; JOHN R. MILLER; JOHN GRICE; and DOES 1 through 5, inclusive, Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 1 1 2 Beginning on September 23, 2016, the Court and Plaintiff have been in a pattern: the Court orders Plaintiff to show cause regarding the status of service of process in this case, (See ECF Nos. 43; 45; 48), and Plaintiff files a status report explaining that 3 4 5 service of process has not been effectuated but that it is continually being attempted. See ECF Nos. 44; 47.) However, Plaintiff’s last update was on December 23, 2016. (ECF No. 47.) Plaintiff failed to update the Court after 90 days regarding its attempts to serve John Grice and Regent Trust, and when the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause 6 7 8 as to the status of service by April 3, 2017, it received no response. (See ECF No. 48.) In the Court’s last Order, it warned Plaintiff that “[f]ailure to timely respond will result in dismissal of the case without further notice.” (Id.) As such, the Court hereby DISMISSES the action without prejudice for failure to respond to the Court’s March 9 27, 2017, Order. 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. April 4, 2017 12 13 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?