FCM Capital Partners LLC v. Regent Corporate Consulting Limited et al
Filing
49
ORDER DIMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: the Court hereby DISMISSES the action without prejudice for failure to respond to the Court's March 27, 2017, Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. See order for further details. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (jy)
1
JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
FCM CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC,
10
11
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
Case No: 2:14-cv-07099-ODW-MAN
ORDER DIMISSING ACTION
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
v.
REGENT CORPORATE
CONSULTING LIMITED; REGENT
TRUST; JOHN R. MILLER; JOHN
GRICE; and DOES 1 through 5,
inclusive,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
1
1
2
Beginning on September 23, 2016, the Court and Plaintiff have been in a pattern:
the Court orders Plaintiff to show cause regarding the status of service of process in this
case, (See ECF Nos. 43; 45; 48), and Plaintiff files a status report explaining that
3
4
5
service of process has not been effectuated but that it is continually being attempted.
See ECF Nos. 44; 47.) However, Plaintiff’s last update was on December 23, 2016.
(ECF No. 47.) Plaintiff failed to update the Court after 90 days regarding its attempts to
serve John Grice and Regent Trust, and when the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause
6
7
8
as to the status of service by April 3, 2017, it received no response. (See ECF No. 48.)
In the Court’s last Order, it warned Plaintiff that “[f]ailure to timely respond will result
in dismissal of the case without further notice.” (Id.) As such, the Court hereby
DISMISSES the action without prejudice for failure to respond to the Court’s March
9
27, 2017, Order.
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
April 4, 2017
12
13
____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?