Machell L. Pollard v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Filing
17
ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 16 by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney f ees under the EAJA in the amount of THREE THOUSAND dollars and 00/CENTS ($3,000.00), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount of FOUR HUNDRED dollars and 00/CENTS ($400.00), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. Any payment shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel. (es)
1
2
3
4
5
Manuel D. Serpa, Calif. Bar No. 174182
LAW OFFICES OF HARRY J. BINDER
AND CHARLES E. BINDER, P.C.
770 The City Drive South Suite 2000
Orange, CA 92868
Phone (714) 564-8644
Fax (714) 940-0311
Email: manuel.serpa@binderlawfirm.com
6
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff Machell L. Pollard
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
MACHELL L. POLLARD,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
16
17
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social
Security,
18
Defendant.
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 14-7293-PLA
ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY
FEES UNDER THE EQUAL
ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT,
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d),
AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28
U.S.C. § 1920
20
Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal
21
22
Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees and Costs, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall
23
be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of THREE THOUSAND
24
dollars and 00/CENTS ($3,000.00), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the
25
amount of FOUR HUNDRED dollars and 00/CENTS ($400.00), subject to the
26
/
27
/
28
/
1
1
terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. Any payment shall be delivered to
2
Plaintiff’s counsel.
3
4
5
Dated: July 7, 2015
PAUL L. ABRAMS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?