Machell L. Pollard v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Filing 17

ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 16 by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney f ees under the EAJA in the amount of THREE THOUSAND dollars and 00/CENTS ($3,000.00), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount of FOUR HUNDRED dollars and 00/CENTS ($400.00), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. Any payment shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel. (es)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Manuel D. Serpa, Calif. Bar No. 174182 LAW OFFICES OF HARRY J. BINDER AND CHARLES E. BINDER, P.C. 770 The City Drive South Suite 2000 Orange, CA 92868 Phone (714) 564-8644 Fax (714) 940-0311 Email: manuel.serpa@binderlawfirm.com 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff Machell L. Pollard 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 MACHELL L. POLLARD, 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 16 17 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 18 Defendant. 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 14-7293-PLA ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 20 Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal 21 22 Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees and Costs, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall 23 be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of THREE THOUSAND 24 dollars and 00/CENTS ($3,000.00), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the 25 amount of FOUR HUNDRED dollars and 00/CENTS ($400.00), subject to the 26 / 27 / 28 / 1 1 terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. Any payment shall be delivered to 2 Plaintiff’s counsel. 3 4 5 Dated: July 7, 2015 PAUL L. ABRAMS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?