Los Angeles Catholic Worker et al v. Los Angeles Downtown Industrial District Business Improvement District et al
Filing
67
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich re Stipulation for Protective Order, 66 (yb)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION
16
17
18
19
20
21
LOS ANGELES CATHOLIC
WORKER, AN
UNINCORPORATED
ASSOCIATION; CANGRESS, A
NON-PROFIT CORPORATION;
HARRY JAMES JONES, LOUIS
GRADY, LLOYD HINKLE,
WALTER SHOAF, INDIVIDUALS,
Plaintiff(s),
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
vs.
LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT, CENTRAL CITY EAST
ASSOCIATION, INC., CITY OF
LOS ANGELES; DOES 1 -10,
Defendant(s).
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. CV 14-07344 PSG (AJW)
DISCOVERY MATTER
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO
APPROVE STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Discovery Cutoff Date: 1/20/2016
Pretrial Date: 4/11/2016
Trial Date: 4/26/2016
1
2
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: After full
3
consideration of the Request by the parties for Order granting approval of the
4
stipulated protective order, and FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY
5
ORDERED that:
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1. The Court adopts and enters the stipulated protective order submitted by
the parties regarding the disclosure of certain documents that may be produced by
the parties that may contain private and confidential information (hereinafter
referred to as "Confidential Materials").
2. This Order shall survive the conclusion of this action, including any
appeals, to the extent that information comprising or contained in the Confidential
Materials does not become public.
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED:
15
16
Dated: December 15, 2015
________________________________
17
The Honorable Andrew J. Wistrich
18
United States Magistrate Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?