Los Angeles Catholic Worker et al v. Los Angeles Downtown Industrial District Business Improvement District et al

Filing 67

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich re Stipulation for Protective Order, 66 (yb)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 16 17 18 19 20 21 LOS ANGELES CATHOLIC WORKER, AN UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION; CANGRESS, A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION; HARRY JAMES JONES, LOUIS GRADY, LLOYD HINKLE, WALTER SHOAF, INDIVIDUALS, Plaintiff(s), 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. LOS ANGELES DOWNTOWN INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, CENTRAL CITY EAST ASSOCIATION, INC., CITY OF LOS ANGELES; DOES 1 -10, Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. CV 14-07344 PSG (AJW) DISCOVERY MATTER ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO APPROVE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Discovery Cutoff Date: 1/20/2016 Pretrial Date: 4/11/2016 Trial Date: 4/26/2016 1 2 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: After full 3 consideration of the Request by the parties for Order granting approval of the 4 stipulated protective order, and FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY 5 ORDERED that: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1. The Court adopts and enters the stipulated protective order submitted by the parties regarding the disclosure of certain documents that may be produced by the parties that may contain private and confidential information (hereinafter referred to as "Confidential Materials"). 2. This Order shall survive the conclusion of this action, including any appeals, to the extent that information comprising or contained in the Confidential Materials does not become public. APPROVED AND SO ORDERED: 15 16 Dated: December 15, 2015 ________________________________ 17 The Honorable Andrew J. Wistrich 18 United States Magistrate Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?