John Smith v. City of Los Angeles et al

Filing 161

JUDGMENT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell that judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant CITY OF LOS ANGELES and against Plaintiff JOHN SMITH, that the claims made against the City of Los Angeles only be dismissed with prejudice; and that Defendant shall recover its costs in accordance with Local Rule 54. (jp)

NO JS-6

1

2

3
4
5

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOHN SMITH,

CASE NO. CV14-07435 BRO (FFM)
Hon. Beverly Reid O'Connell, Ctrm. 14
Mag. FrederickF. Mumm, Ctrm. 580, Roybal

12
Plaintiff,

13

15
16

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
XXXXXXXXX

vs.

14

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, M.
DePasquale, Charles Block, Deborah
Delgado, and DOES 1-10 Inclusive,

17

Defendants.

18

19
20
21

22
23
24

On September 26, 2016, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of

25

Defendant CITY OF LOS ANGELES. The basis for the Court's decision is set forth in

26

the Court's Order dated September 26,2016 (Docket No. 144).

27 III
28 III
1

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is hereby

2

entered in favor of Defendant CITY OF LOS ANGELES and against Plaintiff JOHN

3

SMITH, that the claims made against the City of Los Angeles only be dismissed with

4

prejudice; and that Defendant shall recover its costs in accordance with Local Rule 54.

5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8
9

September 29, 2016

DATED: - - - - -

HONORABLE BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

20
21
22
23
24

25

26
27

28
2