Felix Vargas Carranza v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Filing
17
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 16 . The above captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (bem)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Brian C. Shapiro
Attorney at Law: 192789
Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing
12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Tel.: (562)868-5886
Fax: (562)868-5491
E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Felix Vargas Carranza
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
10
11
FELIX VARGAS CARRANZA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
vs.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
17
) Case No.: 2:14-cv-07481-JPR
)
) ORDER OF DISMISSAL
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
The above captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear
its own fees, costs, and expenses.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE: May 26, 2015
___________________________________
THE HONORABLE JEAN P. ROSENBLUTH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
-1-
1
2
3
4
DATE: May 19, 2015
Respectfully submitted,
LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING
/s/ Brian C. Shapiro
BY: __________________
Brian C. Shapiro
Attorney for plaintiff Felix Vargas Carranza
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-2-
1
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
FOR CASE NUMBER 2:14-CV-07481-JPR
I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Court for this court by using the CM/ECF system on May 20, 2015.
I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and
that service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system.
/s/ Brian C. Shapiro
_______________________________
Brian C. Shapiro
Attorneys for Plaintiff
___________
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?