Felix Vargas Carranza v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Filing 17

ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 16 . The above captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (bem)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Brian C. Shapiro Attorney at Law: 192789 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing 12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel.: (562)868-5886 Fax: (562)868-5491 E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Felix Vargas Carranza 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION 10 11 FELIX VARGAS CARRANZA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 17 ) Case No.: 2:14-cv-07481-JPR ) ) ORDER OF DISMISSAL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 The above captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: May 26, 2015 ___________________________________ THE HONORABLE JEAN P. ROSENBLUTH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 -1- 1 2 3 4 DATE: May 19, 2015 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING /s/ Brian C. Shapiro BY: __________________ Brian C. Shapiro Attorney for plaintiff Felix Vargas Carranza 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -2- 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FOR CASE NUMBER 2:14-CV-07481-JPR I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Court for this court by using the CM/ECF system on May 20, 2015. I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system. /s/ Brian C. Shapiro _______________________________ Brian C. Shapiro Attorneys for Plaintiff ___________ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?