Greg B. Kaplan et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 23

ORDER Approving Joint Stipulation by Judge Gary A. Feess: GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 16 shall be continued from December 1, 2014 to Monday December 15, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs may have until November 19, 2014 to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants may have until December 1, 2014 to reply to Plaintiffs' response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. (smo)

1
2
3
4
5
6

DAVID D. KIM, Esq.(SBN 279155)
[e-mail]
THE LAW OFFICES OF DAVID D. KIM
2426 W. 8th Street, Suite 103
Los Angeles, CA 90057
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
GREG B. KAPLAN and AMALIA KAPLANO

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

WESTERN DIVISION

11
12
13

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

(The Honorable Gary A. Feess)

Plaintiff,

14
15

Case No. CV14-7559 GAF (SSx)

GREG B. KAPLAN and AMALIA
KAPLAN,

ORDER APPROVING JOINT
STIPULATION TO:

v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a
corporation; NDEX WEST, LLC, a
limited liability company; and DOES 1
through 10, Inclusive,
Defendants.

(1) RESET THE HEARING ON
DEFENDANTS WELLS
FARGO BANK, N.A., and
NDEX WEST, LLC’S
MOTION TO DISMISS (DKT.
NO. 16);
(2) ALLOW PLAINTIFFS
GREG B. KAPLAN AND
AMALIA KAPLAN AN
EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
AND NDEX WEST, LLC
MOTION TO DISMISS;
AND
(3) ALLOW DEFENDANTS WELLS
FARGO BANK, N.A. AND NDEX
WEST, LLC AN EXTENSION OF
TIME TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS
RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS

-1ORDER

1

MOTION TO DISMISS

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2ORDER

ORDER

1
2

Pursuant to the joint stipulation of Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ,

3

NDEX West, LLC (collectively “Defendants”) and Plaintiffs Greg B. Kaplan and

4

Amalia (collectively “Plaintiffs”), and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR,

5

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

6

(Docket No. 16) shall be continued from December 1, 2014 to Monday December

7

15, 2014 at 9:30 a.m.

8
9
10
11

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs may have until November 19,
2014 to respond to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants may have until December 1,
2014 to reply to Plaintiffs’ response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.

12
13

DATED: November 7, 2014

14
15

The Honorable Gary A. Feess
United States District Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3ORDER