Lennie Williams v. County of Los Angeles Department of Public Social Services et al
Filing
88
JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna. Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that (1) the operative Second Amended Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend; (2) th e action is dismissed with prejudice as against the County of Los Angeles and defendants Philip L. Browning, Jon Minato, and Dennis Veals; and (3) the action is dismissed without prejudice as against defendant Lupe Luque. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dml)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
LENNIE WILLIAMS,
Case No. CV 14-7625 JVS(JC)
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
15
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
SOCIAL SERVICES, et al.,
16
17
JUDGMENT
Defendants.
18
19
Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions, and
20 Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge,
IT IS ADJUDGED that (1) the operative Second Amended Complaint is
21
22 dismissed without leave to amend; (2) the action is dismissed with prejudice as
23 against the County of Los Angeles and defendants Philip L. Browning, Jon Minato,
24 and Dennis Veals; and (3) the action is dismissed without prejudice as against
25 defendant Lupe Luque.
26
IT IS SO ADJUDGED.
27 DATED: February 8, 2017
______________________________________
28
HONORABLE JAMES V. SELNA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?