Lennie Williams v. County of Los Angeles Department of Public Social Services et al

Filing 88

JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna. Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that (1) the operative Second Amended Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend; (2) th e action is dismissed with prejudice as against the County of Los Angeles and defendants Philip L. Browning, Jon Minato, and Dennis Veals; and (3) the action is dismissed without prejudice as against defendant Lupe Luque. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dml)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 LENNIE WILLIAMS, Case No. CV 14-7625 JVS(JC) Plaintiff, 13 14 v. 15 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES, et al., 16 17 JUDGMENT Defendants. 18 19 Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions, and 20 Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that (1) the operative Second Amended Complaint is 21 22 dismissed without leave to amend; (2) the action is dismissed with prejudice as 23 against the County of Los Angeles and defendants Philip L. Browning, Jon Minato, 24 and Dennis Veals; and (3) the action is dismissed without prejudice as against 25 defendant Lupe Luque. 26 IT IS SO ADJUDGED. 27 DATED: February 8, 2017 ______________________________________ 28 HONORABLE JAMES V. SELNA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?