Royce Mathew v. The Walt Disney Company et al

Filing 103

JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: Judgment is entered against Mathew in favor of Disney on Disney's counterclaim in the Action in the sum of Three Thousand Dollars Five Hundred ($3,500.00). The Clerk is hereby directed to enter judgment accordingly in favor of Disney. Mathew shall retain and preserve his right to appeal the dismissal of his claims in the above-described Action. (bp)

1

JS-6

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION

10

ROYCE MATHEW,

11

Plaintiff,

12

v.

13

25

THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY; TED
ELLIOTT; TERRY ROSSIO; JASON
SURRELL; MARTIN A. SKLAR;
DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC.; WALT
DISNEY PICTURES (d/b/a BUENA
VISTA MOTION PICTURES GROUP and
THE WALT DISNEY STUDIOS, and f/k/a
WALT DISNEY PICTURES AND
TELEVISION); BUENA VISTA HOME
ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; BUENA
VISTA PICTURES DISTRIBUTION,
INC.; BUENA VISTA TELEVISION, LLC
(f/k/a BUENA VISTA TELEVISION);
BUENA VISTA GAMES, INC.; FIRST
MATE PRODUCTIONS, INC.; ABC,
INC.; ABC ENTERPRISES, INC.; JERRY
BRUCKHEIMER; JERRY
BRUCKHEIMER, INC.; JERRY
BRUCKHEIMER FILMS; and “JOHN
DOES 1-50,” WHOSE IDENTITY WILL
BE ASCERTAINED DURING
DISCOVERY TO INCLUDE
ADDITIONAL PERSONS AND
ENTITIES RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
ALLEGED MISCONDUCT,

26

Case No. CV14-07832-RGK
(AGRx)

Defendants.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

27
28
H OGAN L OVELLS US
LLP

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES

\\LA - 022031/000024 - 1168008 v1

1

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Royce Mathew (“Mathew”) filed an action (the

2

“Action”) against Defendant The Walt Disney Company and other captioned

3

Defendants (collectively “Disney”) in the United States District Court for the

4

Southern District of New York, as Mathew v. The Walt Disney Company, No. 13-cv-

5

3930; and

6
7

WHEREAS, the Action was subsequently transferred to the United States

8

District Court for the Central District of California, entitled Mathew v. The Walt

9

Disney Company, No. 14-cv-7832; and

10
11
12

WHEREAS, Disney filed a counterclaim against Mathew in the abovecaptioned Action, which Mathew denies; and

13
14

WHEREAS, by order of April 20, 2015, the United States District Court for the

15

Central District of California dismissed all of Mathew’s claims in the Action

16

(“Dismissal Order”); and

17
18
19

WHEREAS, Disney’s counterclaim remains pending, as noted by the Court’s
minute entry of April 29, 2015; and

20
21
22

WHEREAS, until a final order is entered in the Action, Mathew is not able to
appeal the Court’s Dismissal Order of April 20, 2015;

23
24
25
26

AND NOW, therefore, upon agreement of the parties, it is hereby
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:
1.

Judgment is entered against Mathew in favor of Disney on Disney’s

27

counterclaim in the Action in the sum of Three Thousand Dollars Five

28

Hundreds ($3,500.00).

H OGAN L OVELLS US
LLP

-1-

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES

\\LA - 022031/000024 - 1168008 v1

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

1

2.

Disney.

2
3
4

The Clerk is hereby directed to enter judgment accordingly in favor of

3.

Mathew shall retain and preserve his right to appeal the dismissal of his
claims in the above-described Action.

5
6
7

Dated: October 9, 2015

Hon. Judge R. Gary Klausner
United States District Court Judge

8
9
10

CONSENTED TO:

11
12
13
14

/s/ Edward W. Millstein w/permission
Edward W Millstein
Counsel for Plaintiff
Royce Mathew

15
16
17

/s/ Sanford M. Litvak
Sanford M. Litvak
Counsel for Defendants
The Walt Disney Company, et al.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
H OGAN L OVELLS US
LLP

-2-

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES

\\LA - 022031/000024 - 1168008 v1

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT