BMW of North America, LLC et al v. Autosports European, Inc. et al

Filing 77

PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT EUDM AUTOSPORTS, INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION, AND DISMISSAL filed by Judge S. James Otero (lc)

Download PDF
NOT JS-6 1 2 3 November 16, 2015 4 VC P 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 13 Case No.: 2:14-cv-07961 SJO (PJWx) BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; and BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG, a German Corporation, 14 Plaintiffs, 15 PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT EUDM AUTOSPORTS, INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION, AND DISMISSAL v. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 AUTOSPORTS EUROPEAN, INC., a California Corporation; EG SAVINGS, INC., a California Corporation d/b/a AUDIOCITYWHEELS; SPORTRAK, INC., a California Corporation d/b/a WHEEL PLUS; TOMMY TIM, an Individual d/b/a SD TIRES; UNLIMITED AUTOMOBILE PRODUCTS, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company; MAI LE-TRAN, an Individual d/b/a SD TIRES; THANH NGUYEN, an Individual d/b/a SD TIRES; NAM NGOC TRAN, an Individual d/b/a SD TIRES and a/d/b/a NCW TIRES; EUDM AUTOSPORTS, INC., a New York Corporation; RUBEN ACEVES, an Individual d/b/a UNLEASHED WHEELS; INOVIT, INC., a California Corporation; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Hon. S. James Otero Defendants. 28 -1- [PROPOSED] PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL 1 2 The Court, pursuant to the Stipulation for Entry of Permanent Injunction 3 and Dismissal (“Stipulation”), by and between Plaintiffs BMW OF NORTH 4 AMERICA, LLC (“BMW NA”), and BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG 5 (“BMW AG”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”), and Defendant EUDM AUTOSPORTS, 6 INC. 7 ADJUDICATES and DECREES that a permanent injunction shall be and hereby 8 is entered against Defendant in the above-referenced matter as follows: 9 (“Defendant”) 1. filed concurrently herewith, hereby ORDERS, PERMANENT INJUNCTION. Defendant and any person or entity 10 acting in concert with, or at the direction of Defendant, including any and all 11 agents, servants, employees, partners, assignees, distributors, suppliers, resellers 12 and any others over which Defendant may exercise control, are hereby restrained 13 and enjoined, pursuant to 15 United States Code (“U.S.C.”) §1116(a) and 35 14 U.S.C. §283, from engaging in, directly or indirectly, or authorizing or assisting 15 any third party to engage in, any of the following activities in the United States 16 and throughout the world: 17 i. copying, manufacturing, importing, exporting, purchasing, 18 marketing, selling, offering for sale, distributing or dealing in any product or 19 service that uses, or otherwise making any use of, any of BMW’s intellectual 20 properties, including but not limited to, BMW® and/or M® trademarks and/or 21 design patents D504,382, D515,491, D551,149, D635,078, and D671,477 22 (collectively hereinafter “BMW’s Intellectual Properties”), and/or any intellectual 23 24 25 26 27 28 property that is confusingly or substantially similar to, or that constitutes a colorable imitation of, any BMW Intellectual Properties, whether such use is as, on, in or in connection with any trademark, service mark, trade name, logo, design, Internet use, website, domain name, metatags, advertising, promotions, solicitations, commercial exploitation, television, web-based or any other program, or any product or service, or otherwise; -2- [PROPOSED] PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL ii. 1 advertising or displaying images and/or photographs of non- 2 genuine BMW automobile wheel rims with a BMW® and/or M® center cap or 3 badge; iii. 4 5 advertising or selling non-genuine BMW automobile rims, center caps, or badges; iv. 6 using BMW Intellectual Properties, including but not limited 7 to the BMW® and M® trademarks in advertising to suggest that non-genuine 8 BMW products being advertised are sponsored by, endorsed by, or are otherwise 9 affiliated with BMW and/or advertising non-genuine BMW automobile wheel 10 rims and other non-genuine BMW automotive parts using descriptions that imply 11 that the products are genuine BMW products; v. 12 using, advertising or displaying BMW’s trademarks, including 13 but not limited to BMW®- or M®-trademarks, to suggest that non-genuine BMW 14 products being advertised are manufactured, sponsored or endorsed by BMW or 15 advertising non-genuine BMW automobile parts or related products using 16 descriptions that imply the products are genuine BMW products. Defendant may, 17 however, use “BMW” or other BMW wordmarks to advertise non-BMW products 18 with fair use descriptions such as ‘for BMW automobiles’ or ‘fits BMW model 19 _______,’ or similar language, provided that “BMW” and any other BMW 20 wordmarks that are used are in the identical font, format, size, and color as, and no 21 more prominently displayed than the surrounding text. In no event may any 22 BMW logos, design marks, or other graphical trademarks be used under this 23 exception; 24 vi. performing or allowing others employed by or representing 25 Defendant, or under Defendant’s control, to perform any act or thing which is 26 likely to injure Plaintiffs, any BMW Intellectual Properties, including but not 27 limited to the BMW® and M® trademarks and/or Plaintiffs’ design patents, 28 and/or Plaintiffs’ business reputation or goodwill, including making disparaging, -3- [PROPOSED] PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL 1 negative, or critical comments regarding Plaintiffs or their products and services; vii. 2 engaging in any acts of trademark infringement, false 3 designation of origin, dilution, unfair competition, design patent infringement, or 4 other act which would tend damage or injure Plaintiffs; and/or 5 viii. using any Internet domain name or website that includes any of 6 Plaintiffs’ trademarks or design patents, including but not limited to the BMW®, 7 M®, and MINI® marks and/or design patents D504,382, D515,491, D551,149, 8 D635,078, and D671,477. 9 2. Defendant is ordered to deliver immediately for destruction all 10 counterfeit, infringing or otherwise unauthorized products, including automobile 11 wheel rims, center caps, emblems, badges, labels, signs, prints, packages, 12 wrappers, receptacles and advertisements relating thereto, in its possession and/or 13 under its control embodying, comprised, utilizing and/or bearing any BMW 14 Intellectual Properties, or any simulation, reproduction, counterfeit, copy or 15 colorable imitations thereof, and all plates, molds, heat transfers, screens, matrices 16 and other means of making the same, to the extent that any of these items are in 17 Defendant’s possession. 18 19 20 3. This Permanent Injunction shall be deemed to have been served upon Defendant at the time of its execution by the Court. 4. The Court finds there is no just reason for delay in entering this 21 Permanent Injunction against Defendant, and, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 22 Procedure 54(a), the Court directs immediate entry of this Permanent Injunction 23 against Defendant. 24 25 26 5. Defendant will be making agreed-upon payments to Plaintiffs, as more particularly described in a separate Confidential Settlement Agreement. 6. NO APPEALS AND CONTINUING JURISDICTION. No 27 appeals shall be taken from this Permanent Injunction, and the parties waive all 28 rights to appeal. This Court expressly retains jurisdiction over this matter to -4- [PROPOSED] PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL 1 2 3 4 5 enforce any violation of the terms of this Permanent Injunction by Defendant. 7. NO FEES AND COSTS. Plaintiffs and Defendant shall each bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in this matter. 8. DISMISSAL. Upon entry of this Permanent Injunction against Defendant, the case shall be dismissed as to Defendant only. 6 7 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDICATED and DECREED this 16th day of November, 2015. _________________________________ HON. S. JAMES OTERO District Court Judge of the United States Central District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -5- [PROPOSED] PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?