BMW of North America, LLC et al v. Autosports European, Inc. et al
Filing
77
PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT EUDM AUTOSPORTS, INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION, AND DISMISSAL filed by Judge S. James Otero (lc)
NOT JS-6
1
2
3
November 16, 2015
4
VC
P
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WESTERN DIVISION
11
12
13
Case No.: 2:14-cv-07961 SJO (PJWx)
BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware Limited Liability Company;
and BAYERISCHE MOTOREN
WERKE AG, a German Corporation,
14
Plaintiffs,
15
PERMANENT INJUNCTION
AGAINST DEFENDANT EUDM
AUTOSPORTS, INC., A NEW
YORK CORPORATION, AND
DISMISSAL
v.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
AUTOSPORTS EUROPEAN, INC., a
California Corporation; EG SAVINGS,
INC., a California Corporation d/b/a
AUDIOCITYWHEELS; SPORTRAK,
INC., a California Corporation d/b/a
WHEEL PLUS; TOMMY TIM, an
Individual d/b/a SD TIRES;
UNLIMITED AUTOMOBILE
PRODUCTS, LLC, a California Limited
Liability Company; MAI LE-TRAN, an
Individual d/b/a SD TIRES; THANH
NGUYEN, an Individual d/b/a SD
TIRES; NAM NGOC TRAN, an
Individual d/b/a SD TIRES and a/d/b/a
NCW TIRES; EUDM AUTOSPORTS,
INC., a New York Corporation; RUBEN
ACEVES, an Individual d/b/a
UNLEASHED WHEELS; INOVIT,
INC., a California Corporation; and
DOES 1-10, inclusive,
Hon. S. James Otero
Defendants.
28
-1-
[PROPOSED] PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL
1
2
The Court, pursuant to the Stipulation for Entry of Permanent Injunction
3
and Dismissal (“Stipulation”), by and between Plaintiffs BMW OF NORTH
4
AMERICA, LLC (“BMW NA”), and BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG
5
(“BMW AG”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”), and Defendant EUDM AUTOSPORTS,
6
INC.
7
ADJUDICATES and DECREES that a permanent injunction shall be and hereby
8
is entered against Defendant in the above-referenced matter as follows:
9
(“Defendant”)
1.
filed
concurrently
herewith,
hereby
ORDERS,
PERMANENT INJUNCTION. Defendant and any person or entity
10
acting in concert with, or at the direction of Defendant, including any and all
11
agents, servants, employees, partners, assignees, distributors, suppliers, resellers
12
and any others over which Defendant may exercise control, are hereby restrained
13
and enjoined, pursuant to 15 United States Code (“U.S.C.”) §1116(a) and 35
14
U.S.C. §283, from engaging in, directly or indirectly, or authorizing or assisting
15
any third party to engage in, any of the following activities in the United States
16
and throughout the world:
17
i.
copying, manufacturing, importing, exporting, purchasing,
18
marketing, selling, offering for sale, distributing or dealing in any product or
19
service that uses, or otherwise making any use of, any of BMW’s intellectual
20
properties, including but not limited to, BMW® and/or M® trademarks and/or
21
design patents D504,382, D515,491, D551,149, D635,078, and D671,477
22
(collectively hereinafter “BMW’s Intellectual Properties”), and/or any intellectual
23
24
25
26
27
28
property that is confusingly or substantially similar to, or that constitutes a
colorable imitation of, any BMW Intellectual Properties, whether such use is as,
on, in or in connection with any trademark, service mark, trade name, logo,
design, Internet use, website, domain name, metatags, advertising, promotions,
solicitations, commercial exploitation, television, web-based or any other
program, or any product or service, or otherwise;
-2-
[PROPOSED] PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL
ii.
1
advertising or displaying images and/or photographs of non-
2
genuine BMW automobile wheel rims with a BMW® and/or M® center cap or
3
badge;
iii.
4
5
advertising or selling non-genuine BMW automobile rims,
center caps, or badges;
iv.
6
using BMW Intellectual Properties, including but not limited
7
to the BMW® and M® trademarks in advertising to suggest that non-genuine
8
BMW products being advertised are sponsored by, endorsed by, or are otherwise
9
affiliated with BMW and/or advertising non-genuine BMW automobile wheel
10
rims and other non-genuine BMW automotive parts using descriptions that imply
11
that the products are genuine BMW products;
v.
12
using, advertising or displaying BMW’s trademarks, including
13
but not limited to BMW®- or M®-trademarks, to suggest that non-genuine BMW
14
products being advertised are manufactured, sponsored or endorsed by BMW or
15
advertising non-genuine BMW automobile parts or related products using
16
descriptions that imply the products are genuine BMW products. Defendant may,
17
however, use “BMW” or other BMW wordmarks to advertise non-BMW products
18
with fair use descriptions such as ‘for BMW automobiles’ or ‘fits BMW model
19
_______,’ or similar language, provided that “BMW” and any other BMW
20
wordmarks that are used are in the identical font, format, size, and color as, and no
21
more prominently displayed than the surrounding text. In no event may any
22
BMW logos, design marks, or other graphical trademarks be used under this
23
exception;
24
vi.
performing or allowing others employed by or representing
25
Defendant, or under Defendant’s control, to perform any act or thing which is
26
likely to injure Plaintiffs, any BMW Intellectual Properties, including but not
27
limited to the BMW® and M® trademarks and/or Plaintiffs’ design patents,
28
and/or Plaintiffs’ business reputation or goodwill, including making disparaging,
-3-
[PROPOSED] PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL
1
negative, or critical comments regarding Plaintiffs or their products and services;
vii.
2
engaging in any acts of trademark infringement, false
3
designation of origin, dilution, unfair competition, design patent infringement, or
4
other act which would tend damage or injure Plaintiffs; and/or
5
viii. using any Internet domain name or website that includes any of
6
Plaintiffs’ trademarks or design patents, including but not limited to the BMW®,
7
M®, and MINI® marks and/or design patents D504,382, D515,491, D551,149,
8
D635,078, and D671,477.
9
2.
Defendant is ordered to deliver immediately for destruction all
10
counterfeit, infringing or otherwise unauthorized products, including automobile
11
wheel rims, center caps, emblems, badges, labels, signs, prints, packages,
12
wrappers, receptacles and advertisements relating thereto, in its possession and/or
13
under its control embodying, comprised, utilizing and/or bearing any BMW
14
Intellectual Properties, or any simulation, reproduction, counterfeit, copy or
15
colorable imitations thereof, and all plates, molds, heat transfers, screens, matrices
16
and other means of making the same, to the extent that any of these items are in
17
Defendant’s possession.
18
19
20
3.
This Permanent Injunction shall be deemed to have been served upon
Defendant at the time of its execution by the Court.
4.
The Court finds there is no just reason for delay in entering this
21
Permanent Injunction against Defendant, and, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
22
Procedure 54(a), the Court directs immediate entry of this Permanent Injunction
23
against Defendant.
24
25
26
5.
Defendant will be making agreed-upon payments to Plaintiffs, as
more particularly described in a separate Confidential Settlement Agreement.
6.
NO APPEALS AND CONTINUING JURISDICTION.
No
27
appeals shall be taken from this Permanent Injunction, and the parties waive all
28
rights to appeal. This Court expressly retains jurisdiction over this matter to
-4-
[PROPOSED] PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL
1
2
3
4
5
enforce any violation of the terms of this Permanent Injunction by Defendant.
7.
NO FEES AND COSTS. Plaintiffs and Defendant shall each bear
their own attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in this matter.
8.
DISMISSAL.
Upon entry of this Permanent Injunction against
Defendant, the case shall be dismissed as to Defendant only.
6
7
8
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDICATED and DECREED this 16th day of
November, 2015.
_________________________________
HON. S. JAMES OTERO
District Court Judge of the United States
Central District of California
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-5-
[PROPOSED] PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?