Larry Ragsdale v. Cesar Lopez Flores et al
Filing
32
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 31 . (ec)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LARRY RAGSDALE,
12
Plaintiff
13
14
v.
CESAR LOPEZ FLORES, et al.,
15
Defendants.
Case No. CV 14-8075-ODW (GJS)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
16
17
18
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint and all
19
pleadings, motions, and other documents filed in this action, and the Report and
20
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). The deadline to file
21
Objections to the Report has passed, and no Objections have been filed with the
22
Court.
23
24
25
The Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
(1) Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (Docket 14, “Motion”)
26
is GRANTED respect to Plaintiff’s false report, contraband watch, and
27
retaliation claims, and these claims are dismissed without leave to amend and
28
with prejudice;
1
2
3
(2) The Motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff’s cover up claim, and this
claim is dismissed without leave to amend and without prejudice;
(3) The Motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff’s excessive force claim
4
against Defendants Lopez-Flores and Redding, Defendants’ request for
5
dismissal based upon qualified immunity, and Defendants’ request to strike
6
Plaintiff’s request for punitive damages;
7
8
9
10
11
(4) Defendants’ Motion For Protective Order (Docket 25) is DENIED and the
stay of discovery ordered on April 21, 2015 is VACATED; and
(5) Defendants Lopez- Flores and Redding shall file an Answer to the Complaint
within 21 days of the Court’s Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
14
DATE: October 20, 2015
__________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?