Exist Inc v. Shoreline Wear Inc et al

Filing 33

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky re Stipulation for Protective Order 32 (ib)

Download PDF
4 Sean E. Macias, SBN 201973 MACIAS COUNSEL INC. 302 West Colorado Blvd. Pasadena, California 91105 sean@maciascounsel.com Tel: (626) 844-7707 Fax: (626) 844-7717 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff EXIST, INC. 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 Morgan E. Pietz (SBN 260629) LAW OFFICES OF GERARD FOX 1880 Century Park East, Suite 1410 Los Angeles, California 90067 mpietz@foxtriallawyers.com Telephone: (310) 441-0500 Facsimile : (310) 441-4447 10 11 Attorneys for Defendant SHORELINE WEAR, INC. 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 EXIST INC., a Florida corporation, Case No. 2:14-cv-08358-JAK-(RZx) 16 Plaintiff, 17 18 v. 19 20 21 SHORELINE WEAR, INC., a New York Corporation and DOES 1 through 50 [sic], inclusive, 22 23 Assigned to: Honorable John A. Kronstadt United States District Judge Referred to: Honorable Ralph Zarefsky United States Magistrate Judge STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 -1- STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT 1 1. PURPOSE AND LIMITS OF THIS ORDER 2 Discovery in this action is likely to involve confidential, proprietary, or private 3 information requiring special protection from public disclosure and from use for any 4 purpose other than this litigation. Thus, the Court enters this Protective Order. This 5 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 6 discovery, and the protection it gives from public disclosure and use extends only to 7 the specific material entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal 8 principles. This Order does not automatically authorize the filing under seal 9 of material designated under this Order. Instead, the parties must comply with Local 10 Rule 79-5.1 and this Court’s Order Re Pilot Program for Under Seal Documents 11 (See Exhibit F) if they seek to file anything under seal. This Order does not govern 12 the use at trial of material designated under this Order. 13 2. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 14 2.1 Over-Designation Prohibited. Any party or non-party who 15 designates information or items for protection under this Order as 16 CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY,” 17 or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” (a “designator”) must only 18 designate specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. To the 19 extent practicable, only those parts of documents, items, or oral or written 20 communications that require protection shall be designated. Designations with a 21 higher confidentiality level when a lower level would suffice are prohibited. Mass, 22 indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Unjustified designations 23 expose the designator to sanctions, including the Court’s striking all confidentiality 24 designations made by that designator. Designation under this Order is allowed only 25 if the designation is necessary to protect material that, if disclosed to persons not 26 authorized to view it, would cause competitive or other recognized harm. Material 27 may not be designated if it has been made public, or if designation is otherwise 28 unnecessary to protect a secrecy interest. If a designator learns that information or -2- STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT 1 items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all or do not 2 qualify for the level of protection initially asserted, that designator must promptly 3 notify all parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation. 4 2.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Designation under this 5 Order requires the designator to affix the applicable legend (“CONFIDENTIAL,” 6 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY,” or “HIGHLY 7 CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE”) to each page that contains protected 8 material. For testimony given in deposition or other proceeding, the designator shall 9 specify all protected testimony and the level of protection being asserted. It may 10 make that designation during the deposition or proceeding, or may invoke, on the 11 record or by written notice to all parties on or before the next business day, a 12 right to have up to 21 days from the deposition or proceeding to make its 13 designation. 14 2.2.1 A party or non-party that makes original documents or materials 15 available for inspection need not designate them for protection until after the 16 inspecting party has identified which material it would like copied and produced. 17 During the inspection and before the designation, all material shall be treated as 18 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY. After the inspecting 19 party has identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the producing 20 party must designate the documents, or portions thereof, that qualify for protection 21 under this Order. 22 2.2.2 Parties shall give advance notice if they expect a deposition or 23 other proceeding to include designated material so that the other parties can ensure 24 that only authorized individuals are present at those proceedings when such material 25 is disclosed or used. The use of a document as an exhibit at a deposition shall not in 26 any way affect its designation. Transcripts containing designated material shall have 27 a legend on the title page noting the presence of designated material, and the title 28 page shall be followed by a list of all pages (including line numbers as appropriate) -3- STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT 1 that have been designated, and the level of protection being asserted. The designator 2 shall inform the court reporter of these requirements. Any transcript that is prepared 3 before the expiration of the 21-day period for designation shall be 4 treated during that period as if it had been designated HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 5 ATTORNEY EYES ONLY unless otherwise agreed. After the expiration of the 21- 6 day period, the transcript shall be treated only as actually designated. 7 2.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. An inadvertent failure to 8 designate does not, standing alone, waive protection under this Order. Upon timely 9 assertion or correction of a designation, all recipients must make reasonable efforts 10 11 to ensure that the material is treated according to this Order. 3. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 12 All challenges to confidentiality designations shall proceed under Local Rule 37-1 13 through Local Rule 37-4. 14 4. ACCESS TO DESIGNATED MATERIAL 15 4.1 Basic Principles. A receiving party may use designated material 16 only for this litigation. Designated material may be disclosed only to the categories 17 of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. 18 4.2 Disclosure of CONFIDENTIAL Material Without Further 19 Approval. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the 20 designator, a receiving party may disclose any material designated 21 CONFIDENTIAL only to: 22 23 24 4.2.1 The receiving party’s outside counsel of record in this action and employees of outside counsel of record to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary; 4.2.2 The officers, directors, and employees of the receiving party to 25 whom disclosure is reasonably necessary, and who have signed the Agreement to Be 26 Bound (Exhibit E-1); 27 28 -4- STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT 1 4.2.3 Experts retained by the receiving party’s outside counsel of 2 record to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary, and who have signed the 3 Agreement to Be Bound (Exhibit E-1); 4 4.2.4 The Court and its personnel; 5 4.2.5 Outside court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial 6 consultants, and professional vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary, 7 and who have signed the Agreement to Be Bound (Exhibit E-1); 4.2.6 During their 8 depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary and 9 who have signed the Agreement to Be Bound (Exhibit E-1); and 10 11 12 4.2.7 The author or recipient of a document containing the material, or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information. 4.3 Disclosure of HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY 13 EYES ONLY and HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE Material 14 Without Further Approval. Unless permitted in writing by the designator, a 15 receiving party may disclose material designated HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 16 ATTORNEY EYES ONLY or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE 17 CODE without further approval only to: 18 4.3.1 The receiving party’s outside counsel of record in this action and 19 employees of outside counsel of record to whom it is reasonably necessary to 20 disclose the information; 21 4.3.2 The Court and its personnel; 22 4.3.3 Outside court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial 23 consultants, and professional vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary, 24 and who have signed the Agreement to Be Bound (Exhibit E-1); and 25 26 27 28 4.3.4 The author or recipient of a document containing the material, or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information. 4.4 Procedures for Approving or Objecting to Disclosure of HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY or HIGHLY -5- STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT 1 CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE Material to In-House Counsel or 2 Experts. Unless agreed to in writing by the designator: 3 4.4.1 A party seeking to disclose to in-house counsel any material 4 designated HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY must first 5 make a written request to the designator providing the full name of the in-house 6 counsel, the city and state of such counsel’s residence, and such counsel’s current 7 and reasonably foreseeable future primary job duties and responsibilities in 8 sufficient detail to determine present or potential involvement in any 9 competitive decision-making. In-house counsel are not authorized to receive 10 11 material designated HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE. 4.4.2 A party seeking to disclose to an expert retained by outside 12 counsel of record any information or item that has been designated HIGHLY 13 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 14 SOURCE CODE must first make a written request to the designator that (1) 15 identifies the general categories of HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY 16 EYES ONLY or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE information that 17 the receiving party seeks permission to disclose to the expert, (2) sets forth the 18 full name of the expert and the city and state of his or her primary residence, (3) 19 attaches a copy of the expert’s current resume, (4) identifies the expert’s current 20 employer(s), (5) identifies each person or entity from whom the expert has received 21 compensation or funding for work in his or her areas of expertise (including in 22 connection with litigation) in the past five years, and (6) identifies (by name and 23 number of the case, filing date, and location of court) any litigation where the expert 24 has offered expert testimony, including by declaration, report, or testimony at 25 deposition or trial, in the past five years. If the expert believes any of this 26 information at (4) - (6) is subject to a confidentiality obligation to a third party, then 27 the expert should provide whatever information the expert believes can be disclosed 28 without violating any confidentiality agreements, and the party seeking to disclose -6- STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT 1 the information to the expert shall be available to meet and confer with the 2 designator regarding any such confidentiality obligations. 3 4.4.3 A party that makes a request and provides the information 4 specified in paragraphs 4.4.1 or 4.4.2 may disclose the designated material to the 5 identified in-house counsel or expert unless, within seven days of delivering the 6 request, the party receives a written objection from the designator providing detailed 7 grounds for the objection. 8 9 4.4.4 All challenges to objections from the designator shall proceed under Local Rule 37-1 through Local Rule 37-4. 10 5. SOURCE CODE 11 5.1 Designation of Source Code. If production of source code is 12 necessary, a party may designate it as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE 13 CODE if it is, or includes, confidential, proprietary, or trade secret source code. 14 5.2 Location and Supervision of Inspection. Any HIGHLY 15 CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE produced in discovery shall be made available 16 for inspection, in a format allowing it to be reasonably reviewed and searched, 17 during normal business hours or at other mutually agreeable times, at an office of the 18 designating party’s counsel or another mutually agreeable location. The source code 19 shall be made available for inspection on a secured computer in a secured room, and 20 the inspecting party shall not copy, remove, or otherwise transfer any portion of the 21 source code onto any recordable media or recordable device. The designator may 22 visually monitor the activities of the inspecting party’s representatives during 23 any source code review, but only to ensure that there is no unauthorized recording, 24 copying, or transmission of the source code. 25 5.3 Paper Copies of Source Code Excerpts. The inspecting party 26 may request paper copies of limited portions of source code that are reasonably 27 necessary for the preparation of court filings, pleadings, expert reports, other papers, 28 or for deposition or trial. The designator shall provide all such source code in paper -7- STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT 1 form, including Bates numbers and the label “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 2 SOURCE CODE.” 3 5.4 Access Record. The inspecting party shall maintain a record of 4 any individual who has inspected any portion of the source code in electronic or 5 paper form, and shall maintain all paper copies of any printed portions of the source 6 code in a secured, locked area. The inspecting party shall not convert any of the 7 information contained in the paper copies into any electronic format other than for 8 the preparation of a pleading, exhibit, expert report, discovery document, deposition 9 transcript, or other Court document. Any paper copies used during a deposition shall 10 be retrieved at the end of each day and must not be left with a court 11 reporter or any other unauthorized individual. 12 13 14 6. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER LITIGATION 6.1 Subpoenas and Court Orders. This Order in no way excuses 15 noncompliance with a lawful subpoena or court order. The purpose of the duties 16 described in this section is to alert the interested parties to the existence of this Order 17 and to give the designator an opportunity to protect its confidentiality interests in the 18 court where the subpoena or order issued. 19 6.2 Notification Requirement. If a party is served with a subpoena 20 or a court order issued in other litigation that compels disclosure of any information 21 or items received by that party in this action and designated in this action as 22 CONFIDENTIAL, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY, or 23 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE, that party must do the following. 24 25 26 27 28 6.2.1 Promptly notify the designator in writing. Such notification shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order. 6.2.2 Promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the -8- STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT 1 subpoena or order is subject to this Order. Such notification shall include a copy of 2 this Order. 3 4 5 6.2.3 Cooperate with all reasonable procedures sought by the designator whose material may be affected. 6.3 Wait For Resolution of Protective Order. If the designator 6 promptly seeks a protective order, the party served with the subpoena or court order 7 shall not produce any information designated in this action as CONFIDENTIAL, 8 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY or HIGHLY 9 CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE before a determination by the court where the 10 subpoena or order issued, unless the party has obtained the designator’s permission. 11 The designator shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection of its 12 confidential material in that court. 13 7. 14 MATERIAL 15 If a receiving party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed 16 designated material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this 17 Order, it must immediately (1) notify in writing the designator of the unauthorized 18 disclosures, (2) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the 19 designated material, (3) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized 20 disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order, and (4) use reasonable efforts to 21 have such person or persons execute the Agreement to Be Bound (Exhibit E-1). 22 8. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF DESIGNATED INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR 23 OTHERWISE PROTECTED MATERIAL 24 When a producing party gives notice that certain inadvertently produced material is 25 subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the receiving 26 parties are those set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5)(B). This provision is not 27 intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order 28 -9- STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT 1 that provides for production without prior privilege review pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 2 502(d) and (e). 3 9. FILING UNDER SEAL 4 Without written permission from the designator or a Court order, a party may not 5 file in the public record in this action any designated material. A party seeking to file 6 under seal any designated material must comply with Local Rule 79-1. Filings may 7 be made under seal only pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the 8 specific material at issue. The fact that a document has been designated under this 9 Order is insufficient to justify filing under seal. Instead, parties must explain the 10 basis for confidentiality of each document sought to be filed under seal. Because a 11 party other than the designator will often be seeking to file designated material, 12 cooperation between the parties in preparing, and in reducing the number and extent 13 of, requests for under seal filing is essential. If a receiving party’s request to file 14 designated material under seal pursuant to Local Rule 79-5.1 is denied by the Court, 15 then the receiving party may file the material in the public record unless (1) the 16 designator seeks reconsideration within four days of the denial, or (2) as otherwise 17 instructed by the Court. 18 10. FINAL DISPOSITION 19 Within 60 days after the final disposition of this action, each party shall return all 20 designated material to the designator or destroy such material, including all copies, 21 abstracts, compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing 22 any designated material. The receiving party must submit a written certification to 23 the designator by the 60-day deadline that (1) identifies (by category, where 24 appropriate) all the designated material that was returned or destroyed, and (2) 25 affirms that the receiving party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, 26 summaries, or any other format reproducing or capturing any of the designated 27 material. This provision shall not prevent counsel from retaining an archival copy of 28 -10- STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT 1 all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal 2 memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney 3 work product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such materials 4 contain designated material. Any such archival copies remain subject to this Order. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 DATED: 4/28/15 BY: ________________________________ 9 Honorable Ralph Zarefsky United States Magistrate Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -11- STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT EXHIBIT E-1 AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 I, ___________________________________________ [print or type full name], of ___________________________________________________________________ [print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for the Central District of California on _____________ [date] in the case of Exist, Inc. v. Shoreline Wear, Inc., C.D. Cal. No. 2:14-cv-08358-JAK(RZx). I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Protective Order, and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment for contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject to this Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with this Order. I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Central District of California for the purpose of enforcing this Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action. 15 16 17 18 19 I hereby appoint ________________________________ [print or type full name] of ___________________________________________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any proceedings related to enforcement of this Order. 20 21 Date: _________________________________ City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________ Printed name: _________________________________ Signature: _________________________________ 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -12- STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?