Trevor Woods et al v. John B. Fagan et al
Filing
22
PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR CONFIDENTIAL LBPD DOCUMENTS by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 N.W., etc.,
11
Case No. EDCV 14-01569 VAP (SPx)
Case No. CV 14-08374 VAP (SPx)
Plaintiff,
12
13
PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR
CONFIDENTIAL LBPD
DOCUMENTS
vs.
14 CITY OF LONG BEACH; et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17 TREVOR WOODS, et al.,
18
19
Plaintiffs,
vs.
20
21 OFFICER JOHN B. FAGAN; et al.,
22
Defendants.
23
24
25
Based upon the Stipulation of the Parties and, GOOD CAUSE APPEARING,
26 IT IS ORDERED THAT,
27
1.
Attorneys for the parties shall receive from the Long Beach
28 Police Department Custodian of Records copies of portions of the personnel files of
EDCV 14-1569 VAP (SPx)/CV 14-8374 VAP (SPx)
PROTECTIVE ORDER
1 Defendant Officers John Fagan and Daniel Martinez. The information will be
2 limited to the officers’ use-of-force history summaries, and the officers’ Internal
3 Affairs history summaries as it pertains to allegations of excessive use of force
4 and/or dishonesty. The attorneys for the parties understand and agree that the
5 production of the summaries is limited to the summaries information available at the
6 time of the request, and that the certain records may have been purged.
7
2.
“Confidential Information” protected by this Protective Order
8 must be clearly designated prior to the disclosure or production of such Confidential
9 Information, and must bear the notation of “Confidential” on each page that contains
10 Confidential Information, provided that such notation does not obscure or obliterate
11 the document contents. “Highly Confidential—Attorneys’ Eyes Only Information”
12 protected by this Protective Order must be clearly designated prior to the disclosure
13 or production of such Confidential Information, and must bear the notation of
14 “Highly Confidential—Attorneys’ Eyes Only” on each page that contains such
15 information, provided that such notation does not obscure or obliterate the document
16 contents. Information may qualify as “Highly Confidential—Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
17 only if it consists of extremely sensitive information whose disclosure to another
18 party or non-party would create a substantial risk of serious injury that could not be
19 avoided by less restrictive means.
20
3.
Attorneys for the parties shall receive from the Long Beach
21 Police Department Custodian of Records copies of personnel evaluations for the
22 named-defendant officers.
23
4.
Attorneys for the parties shall receive from the Long Beach
24 Police Department Custodian of Records copies of the POST training summaries for
25 the named-defendant officers.
26
5.
Attorneys for the parties shall personally secure and maintain
27 said copies in their possession to the end that said copies are to be used only for the
28 purposes set forth below and for no other purpose.
-2-
EDCV 14-1569 VAP (SPx)/CV 14-8374 VAP (SPx)
PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
6.
Copies of the record shall only be used for preparing for and
2 prosecuting or defending this case pending the completion of the judicial process
3 including appeal, if any. “Confidential Information” or “Highly Confidential—
4 Attorneys’ Eyes Only Information” that a party intends to use in support of or in
5 opposition to a pre-trial filing with the Court must be filed in accordance with the
6 Central District of California Local Rules relating to under seal filings, including
7 Local Rule 79-5. The parties shall made good faith efforts to consent to the use of
8 “Confidential Information” or “Highly Confidential—Attorneys’ Eyes Only
9 Information,” and shall meet and confer to discuss redactions of particularly
10 sensitive information before making use thereof. Should a party challenge the
11 designation of “Confidential Information” or “Highly Confidential—Attorneys’
12 Eyes Only Information,” that party must do so in good faith, and shall confer
13 directly with counsel for the producing party.
14
7.
This Order does not govern the use at trial of material designated
15 under this Order. The parties, however, may otherwise use copies of the records to
16 prepare for trial, including – but not limited to - use of the records at depositions
17 (under seal) and for law and motion practice.
18
8.
Disclosure of Information designated “Confidential” shall be
19 limited to the following personnel and/or classification of persons: Any Party to this
20 action and that Party’s counsel; staff and personnel employed by counsel for any
21 party to this action; the Court and court personnel, in connection with this litigation;
22 during their depositions, witnesses who, from the face of the document, appear to
23 have previously created, authored, or received it; and experts or consultants
24 retained/consulted to work on this case by counsel for any party to this action (so
25 long as each such expert or consultant agrees, in writing, to be bound by the terms of
26 this Protective Order).
27
9.
Disclosure of Information designated “Highly Confidential—
28 Attorneys’ Eyes Only” shall be limited to the following personnel and/or
-3-
EDCV 14-1569 VAP (SPx)/CV 14-8374 VAP (SPx)
PROTECTIVE ORDER
1 classification of persons: Any Party’s counsel; staff and personnel employed by
2 counsel for any party to this action; the Court and court personnel, in connection
3 with this litigation; during their depositions, witnesses who, from the face of the
4 document, appear to have previously created, authored, or received it; and experts or
5 consultants retained/consulted to work on this case by counsel for any party to this
6 action (so long as each such expert or consultant agrees, in writing, to be bound by
7 the terms of this Protective Order).
8
10.
Any depositions, during which the contents of copies of the
9 records are part of the testimony or copies of the records are attached as exhibits,
10 shall be sealed as to any confidential portions.
11
11.
After completion of the judicial process in this case, attorneys for
12 the parties shall return the above-referenced records to the Office of the City
13 Attorney as attorney for the Custodian of Records for the Long Beach Police
14 Department and shall retain no copy of such material in any form.
15
12.
Attorneys for the parties shall cause the substance of this Order
16 to be communicated to each person to whom the information is revealed in
17 accordance with this Order.
18
13.
The attorneys for the parties shall not cause or knowingly
19 permit disclosure of the contents of the copies beyond the disclosure permitted
20 under the terms and conditions of this Order, including but not limited to any news
21 media which is inclusive of film or video, television, radio or print.
22
14.
This order may be signed in counterparts. A faxed signature
23 shall serve with the same force and effect of an original signature.
24
The Court retains jurisdiction to modify this Protective Order and to
25 make further Orders with respect to control and use of the information delivered to
26 the attorneys for the parties pursuant to this Order, including Orders as to the
27 ultimate disposition of said copies while the judicial process is pending.
28
-4-
EDCV 14-1569 VAP (SPx)/CV 14-8374 VAP (SPx)
PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4
5
6
DATED: March 13, 2015
7
/s/
Hon. Sheri Pym
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
Approved as to form and content:
DATED: February 2, 2015
LAW OFFICE OF JOHN C. FATTAHI
11
12
13
By
/s/ John C. Fattahi
John C. Fattahi
Attorney for Plaintiff N.W.
EDCV 14-01569 VAP (SPx)
14
15 DATED: February 27, 2015
CHARLES PARKIN, City Attorney
16
17
18
19
By
/s/ Howard D. Russell
HOWARD D. RUSSELL
Assistant City Attorney
Attorney for Defendants City of Long
Beach, et al.
20
21 DATED: March 2, 2015
THE COCHRAN FIRM CALIFORNIA
22
23
24
25
By
/s/ Brian T. Dunn
Brian T. Dunn
Megan R. Gyongyos
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Trevor Woods and
Tyra Woodson
CV 14-08374 VAP (SPx)
26
27
28
-5-
EDCV 14-1569 VAP (SPx)/CV 14-8374 VAP (SPx)
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?