Hrayr Shahinian v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation

Filing 578

AMENDED JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (See order for details.) (kti)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ) BAHAMAS SURGERY CENTER, LLC, ) Case No. CV 14-8390-DMG (PLAx) ) et al., ) ) AMENDED JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, ) ) et. al., ) ) Defendants. ) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- 1 This matter having come before the Court for a jury trial on March 28, 2017 2 through April 7, 2017 and a subsequent court trial [Doc. ## 517, 521], and the jury’s 3 verdict having been rendered on the jury trial [Doc. ## 501, 503] and this Court having 4 filed its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as to the court trial [Doc. # 529], 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment is 6 entered in favor of Plaintiff Bahamas Surgery Center, LLC and class members, and 7 against Defendants Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Halyard Health, Inc. in the 8 following amounts: 9 prejudgment interest accrued as of May 15, 2017, and $19,446,635 in punitive damages 10 against Kimberly-Clark; and (2) $261,445 in compensatory damages, $43,788.99 in 11 prejudgment interest accrued as of May 15, 2017, and $1,307,225 in punitive damages 12 against Halyard Health. Plaintiff and class members are also entitled to the recovery of 13 additional prejudgment interest on the aforementioned compensatory damages award that 14 accrued on and between May 16, 2017 and the date of this Amended Judgment at the rate 15 of 7% per annum. See Parties’ Joint Stipulation re Prejudgment Interest [Doc. # 516]. (1) $3,889,327 in compensatory damages, $1,062,391.75 in 16 17 DATED: April 11, 2018 18 19 DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?