Robert Bosch GmbH et al v. Deeds Performance et al
Filing
61
PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST DEEDS PERFORMANCE AND JOSHUA LEE DEEDS by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell, it is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that: Judgment is entered for Plaintiffs and against Defendants on all of Plainti ffs' claims. Plaintiffs are awarded damages against Deeds Performance in the amount of $200,000, and judgment is hereby entered against Deeds Performance for this amount. Counsel for Plaintiffs is awarded attorneys' fees against Deeds Performance in the amount of $7,600, and judgment is hereby entered against Deeds Performance for this amount. The attorneys' fees award described in Paragraph 3 above is in addition to the $200,000 award set forth in Paragraph 2 above. Defendants are permanently enjoined and restrained. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WESTERN DIVISION
11 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH and
ROBERT BOSCH LLC,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
v.
15 DEEDS PERFORMANCE and
JOSHUA LEE DEEDS,
16
CASE NO. 2:14-cv-08517-BRO-AJW
PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND
FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST
DEEDS PERFORMANCE AND
JOSHUA LEE DEEDS
HON. BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL
Defendants.
17
18
19
Plaintiffs Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC (“Plaintiffs”) filed
20 their Complaint on November 3, 2014, against Defendants Deeds Performance and
21 Joshua Lee Deeds for counterfeiting, trademark infringement, unfair competition,
22 and false advertising in violation of the Lanham Act, and for unfair competition and
23 false advertising in violation of California law.
24
Based on the findings set forth in this Court’s Order of June 29, 2015, as well
25 as the parties’ subsequent agreement, it is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed
26 that:
27
1.
Judgment is entered for Plaintiffs and against Defendants on all of
28 Plaintiffs’ claims.
-1-
14-cv-08517-BRO-AJW
1
2.
Plaintiffs are awarded damages against Deeds Performance in the
2 amount of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000), and judgment is hereby entered
3 against Deeds Performance for this amount.
4
3.
Counsel for Plaintiffs is awarded attorneys’ fees against Deeds
5 Performance in the amount of seven thousand and six hundred dollars ($7,600), and
6 judgment is hereby entered against Deeds Performance for this amount.
7
4.
The attorneys’ fees award described in Paragraph 3 above is in addition
8 to the $200,000 award set forth in Paragraph 2 above.
9
5.
Defendants are permanently enjoined and restrained from directly or
10 indirectly infringing the trademarks BOSCH and
(collectively, the “BOSCH
11 Marks”) in any manner, and specifically:
12
a. Using the BOSCH Marks, or any marks similar thereto, or any
13
reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of the
14
BOSCH Marks, in connection with the promotion, marketing,
15
advertising, offering for sale, or sale of non- BOSCH goods or
16
services, i.e., goods or services that are not produced by
17
Plaintiffs, or which do not originate from Plaintiffs.
18
19
20
b. Promoting, marketing, advertising, offering for sale, or selling
any counterfeit BOSCH goods.
c. Promoting, marketing, advertising, offering for sale, or selling
21
any modified BOSCH goods without proper disclosures advising
22
consumers of such modifications.
23
d. Promoting, marketing, advertising, offering for sale, or selling
24
any modified BOSCH goods while claiming that such products
25
are genuine, unmodified BOSCH goods.
26
e. Importing for resale into the United States, offering for sale in
27
the United States, or selling in the United States any BOSCH
28
product not authorized by Plaintiffs for sale in the United States.
14-cv-08517-BRO-AJW
-2-
1
f. Using any mark that is likely to be confused by the public with
2
the BOSCH Marks in connection with the manufacture,
3
promotion, sale or offering for sale of:
4
i. any non-genuine BOSCH products; or
5
ii. any modified BOSCH products without proper disclosures
6
advising consumers of such modifications.
7
g. Using any other trademark, trade name, logo, or design that tends
8
to represent falsely, or that is likely to confuse, mislead, or
9
deceive consumers to believe that any non-genuine BOSCH
10
products or modified BOSCH products are genuine, unmodified
11
BOSCH products, or that said goods have been sponsored,
12
approved, or licensed by Plaintiffs for consumer use.
13
h. Engaging in any conduct that tends falsely to represent that, or is
14
likely to confuse, mislead, or deceive consumers to believe that,
15
Defendants or any non-genuine BOSCH products or any
16
modified BOSCH products are sponsored, approved, or licensed
17
by Plaintiffs for consumer use.
18
i. Affixing, applying, annexing, or using in connection with the
19
promotion, advertising, sale, or offering for sale of any non-
20
genuine BOSCH products or any modified BOSCH products a
21
false description or representation or misleading statement of fact
22
that misrepresents the nature, qualities, characteristics, standard,
23
grade, style, or model of such goods or services, including but
24
not limited to, falsely representing that such products are new,
25
genuine, or non-modified BOSCH products.
26
6.
Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1118, unless Defendants have obtained written
27 permission from Plaintiffs by August 28, 2015, Deeds Performance shall at that time
28
-3-
14-cv-08517-BRO-AJW
1 surrender any of the following materials in their possession or under their control to
2 Plaintiffs:
3
a. Any counterfeit or trademark infringing products;
4
b. Any labels, tags, signs, prints, packaging, and advertisements
5
6
therefor; and
c. Any molds, matrices, or other means for making the same.
7
8
9 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
10 Dated: September 28, 2015
11
12
HONORABLE BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
14-cv-08517-BRO-AJW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?