Chris Langer v. Say Kim Ly et al

Filing 29

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge John F. Walter. Plaintiff's counsel Phyl Grace and Raymond Ballister are ordered to show cause in writing by June 15, 2015 why they should not each be sanctioned in the amount of $1,500.00 or why this action should not be dismissed. No oral argument on this matter will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jloz)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL Case No. CV 14-8568-JFW (VBKx) Title: Chris Langer-v- Say Kim Ly, et al. Date: June 8, 2015 PRESENT: HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Shannon Reilly Courtroom Deputy None Present Court Reporter ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: None PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS: None ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Based on the Declaration of Katherine Butts Warwick filed June 5, 2015 [Docket No. 26-1], it appears that plaintiff's counsel has wilfully violated the Court's Local Rules and the Court's Scheduling and Case Management Order by refusing to respond to counsel's efforts to comply with Local Rule 7-3. Plaintiff's counsel Phyl Grace and Raymond Ballister are ordered to show cause in writing by June 15, 2015 why they should not each be sanctioned in the amount of $1,500.00 or why this action should not be dismissed. No oral argument on this matter will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action IT IS SO ORDERED. Initials of Deputy Clerk sr

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?