Wayne Kramer et al v. Hysteric Glamour et al

Filing 51

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell, GRANTING Stipulation to Dismiss Case 50 . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED to the dismissal of the entireaction (including Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint, Counter Plaintiffs FirstAmended Counterclaims and Third Party Complaint), with prejudice, pursuant toRule 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 Heather L. Blaise, SBN 261619 LAW OFFICE OF HEATHER L. BLAISE, P.C. 20 N. Clark St. Suite 3100 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Telephone: (312) 448-6602 Facsimile: (312) 803-1940 E-Mail: heather.blaise@gmail.com 5 6 WAYNE KRAMER and MARGARET SAADI KRAMER 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 Wayne Kramer, an individual; Margaret Saadi Kramer, an individual, Plaintiffs, 15 16 17 18 19 20 v. Case No. 2:14 CV 08665 BRO (SHx) ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE HYSTERIC GLAMOUR, a Japanese corporation; HYSTERIC GLAMOUR [FRCP 41(a)] USA, a California corporation, KEN KAWAMINAMI, an individual, ATOM AGE INDUSTRIES, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, ROBERT ARCE, an individual, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 21 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 1 Plaintiffs Wayne Kramer, an individual, and Margaret Kramer, an individual, 2 by and through their attorneys, LAW OFFICE OF HEATHER L. BLAISE, P.C., 3 and Defendants, OZONE COMMUNITY CORP. d/b/a HYSTERIC GLAMOUR, a 4 Japanese corporation, HYSTERIC GLAMOUR USA, INC., a California 5 corporation, and KEN KAWAMINAMI, an individual, by and through their 6 attorneys, JAMES D. KOZMOR, INC., and Defendants and Counter Plaintiffs 7 ROBERT ARCE and ATOM AGE INDUSTRIES, LLC, by and through their 8 attorneys, MCLAIN, PC, HEREBY STIPULATE to the dismissal of the entire 9 action (including Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint, Counter Plaintiffs’ First 10 Amended Counterclaims and Third Party Complaint), with prejudice, pursuant to 11 Rule 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with each party to bear 12 its own attorney’s fees and costs. 13 14 15 LAW OFFICE OF HEATHER L. BLAISE, P.C. 16 17 Dated: December 10, 2015 By: 18 19 /s/ Heather L. Blaise Heather L. Blaise Attorneys for Plaintiffs WAYNE KRAMER and MARGARET SAADI KRAMER 20 21 22 JAMES D. KOZMOR, INC. 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: /s/ James D. Kozmor James D. Kozmor Attorney for Defendants OZONE COMMUNITY CORP. d/b/a HYSTERIC GLAMOUR, HYSTERIC GLAMOUR USA, INC. and KEN KAWAMINAMI -2JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 1 MCLAIN, P.C. 2 By: 3 4 5 /s/ Erik M. McLain Erik McLain Attorney for Defendants and Counter Plaintiffs Atom Age Industries, LLC and Robert Arce 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 11 December 15, Dated: ___________ 2015 _______________________________________ ___________ ________________ _ _ ___ ____ ___ ___ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ED STAT S TATE TA A 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?