Carmax Auto Superstores California LLC v. Rosella Hernandez

Filing 27

AMENDED JUDGMENT Nunc Pro Tunc as of April 30, 2015 by Judge Margaret M. Morrow, in favor of Carmax Auto Superstores California LLC against Rosella Michelle Hernandez: Consequently, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED 1. That the parties shall arbitrate thei r dispute pursuant to the terms of the operative Dispute Resolution Agreement; 2. That the proceedings currently pending in Orange County Superior Court be stayed pending completion of the arbitration; and 3. That the action be, and it hereby is, dismissed. Related to: Judgment 21 (bm)

Nunc Pro Tunc as of
April 30, 2015
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES
CALIFORNIA LLC, a Virginia limited
liability company,

13
14
15

Petitioner,
vs.

16

ROSELLA MICHELLE HERNANDEZ, an
individual,

17

Respondent.

18

) CASE NO. CV 14-08743 MMM (JEMx)
)
)
)
) AMENDED JUDGMENT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

19
20

On November 12, 2014, CarMax Auto Superstores California LLC (“CarMax”) filed a petition

21

for an order compelling arbitration under § 4 of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. § 4; it

22

also sought a stay of state court proceedings arising out of its dispute with Rosella Michelle Hernandez.

23

On April 30, 2015, the court issued an order granting CarMax’s petition and staying state court

24

proceedings. Consequently,

25
26
27
28

1

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

2

1.

3
4

Dispute Resolution Agreement;
2.

5
6

That the parties shall arbitrate their dispute pursuant to the terms of the operative

That the proceedings currently pending in Orange County Superior Court be
stayed pending completion of the arbitration; and

3.

That the action be, and it hereby is, dismissed.

7
8

DATED: May 28, 2015
MARGARET M. MORROW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2