United States of America et al v. Gardens Regional Hospital and Medical Center Inc et al
JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter, re: Stipulation 164 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 58(a), (b)(2)(B), (d), and the parties joint request, the Court hereby enters judgment in favor of defendants, such that all relief requested in Winters Second Amended Complaint is denied. The Clerk shall enter judgment as described herein pursuant to Civil Local Rule 58-4. (iv)
MICHAEL J. KHOURI, ESQ. [SBN 97654]
ANDREW B. GOODMAN, ESQ. [SBN 267972]
KHOURI LAW FIRM, APC
24012 Calle De La Plata, Suite 210
Laguna Hills, California 92653
Telephone: (949) 336-2433
Attorneys for qui tam plaintiff JANE WINTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex
rel. JANE WINTER,
Case No. 2:14-cv-08850-JFW-E
[Joint Stipulation submitted
GARDENS REGIONAL HOSPITAL
AND MEDICAL CENTER, INC.
D/B/A TRI-CITY REGIONAL
MEDICAL CENTER, a California
Corporation; ROLLINSNELSON LTC
CORP., a California Corporation; S&W
SERVICES, INC., a California
Corporation; VICKI ROLLINS, an
individual; BILL NELSON, an
individual; BERYL WEINER, an
individual; PRODE PASCUAL, M.D.,
an individual; RAFAELITO
VICTORIA, M.D., an individual;
ARNOLD LING, M.D., an individual;
M.D., an individual; EDGARDO
BINOYA, M.D., an individual;
NAMIKO NERIO, M.D., an individual;
MANUEL SACAPANO, M.D., an
For good cause shown, and in accordance with the concurrently submitted
Joint Stipulation, the Court finds that:
On December 29, 2017, the Court granted Defendants’ Motions to
Dismiss, and dismissed Winter’s Second Amended Complaint with prejudice, with
the exception of a retaliation claim under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h) against unserved
defendant GARDENS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. (“Gardens
Regional”). Document No. 149.
On January 30, 2018, Winter voluntarily dismissed her retaliation
claim under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h) against unserved defendant Gardens Regional.
Document No. 161.
On February 7, 2018, the Court denied a Joint Motion for Attorneys’
Fees by defendants RollinsNelson, Nelson, Rollins, Weiner, S&W, and Dr.
Pascual. Document No. 163.
There are no more outstanding claims or motions currently before this
Court on the above-captioned case.
Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 58(a), (b)(2)(B), (d), and
the parties’ joint request, the Court hereby enters judgment in favor of defendants,
such that all relief requested in Winter’s Second Amended Complaint is denied.
The Clerk shall enter judgment as described herein pursuant to Civil Local Rule
IT IS SO ORDERED.
February 9, 2018
The Honorable John F. Walter
Judge, United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?