Quentin Eugene Bell v. Warden

Filing 29

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the Unit ed States Magistrate Judge 23 . Petitioner has filed Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. (kl)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 QUENTIN EUGENE BELL, 13 Petitioner, 14 15 v. WARDEN, 16 Respondent. 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 14-9119-DSF (JEM) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the 19 records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 20 Judge. Petitioner has filed Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of 21 those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The 22 Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 23 24 IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. 25 26 27 28 3/1/17 DATED: DALE S. FISCHER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?