Ming Hsieh v. Zhe Xu et al

Filing 91

MINUTE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The defense is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE for its failure to comply with the joint filing process and to submit a substantive response to the discovery motion by October 2, at 3:00 p.m. (mz)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 14-9396 JAK (MRWx) Title Hsieh v. Xu Present: The Honorable Date September 25, 2015 Michael R. Wilner Veronica McKamie n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant: None present None present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Plaintiff filed a discovery motion that is not in the joint format mandated under the Local Rules. (Docket # 87.) The motion is accompanied by a declaration (as required under Local Rule 37-2.4) that indicates that the defense did not provide its portion of the joint motion before Plaintiff filed it. (Docket # 87-2 at 4.) The Court further observes that it conducted an informal call with the parties in early September in an effort to mediate this discovery dispute – the parties appeared to agree on a way forward with discovery that suggested that motion practice was not necessary. A party’s failure to file a required document within a deadline set by local rule or to cooperate in the submission of a joint discovery motion “may be deemed consent to the granting [ ] of the motion.” Local Rule 7-12. Therefore, the defense is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE for its failure to comply with the joint filing process and to submit a substantive response to the discovery motion by October 2, at 3:00 p.m. If the Court does not receive any submission, the motion will be granted as unopposed under local rule without further proceedings. CV-90 (10/08) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?