Orphic LLC et al vs. Massimo Nocerino et al.

Filing 58

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Pursuant to a stipulation 57 entered by the parties and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint and Cross-Complaint in this action are dismiss ed, with prejudice, with each side to bear its own costs and attorneys fees. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action for purposes of enforcing the Settlement Agreement entered into between the parties. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (vv)

Download PDF
5 Carole E. Handler (SBN 129381) chandler@eisnerlaw.com Kathleen Cerniglia Hipps (SBN 268019) Brianna Dahlberg (SBN 280711) bdahlberg@eisnerlaw.com EISNER JAFFE 9601 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 700 Beverly Hills, California 90210 Telephone: (310) 855-3200 Facsimile: (310) 855-3201 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff, ORPHIC LLC 7 Elizabeth A. Bell (State Bar No. 205868) ebell@elbelaw.com 8335 Sunset Boulevard, Suite 221 Los Angeles, CA 90069 Telephone: (323) 306-4077 Fax: (323) 656-1396 1 2 3 4 8 9 BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA 90210 EISNER JAFFE 9601 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 700 10 11 JS-6 Attorney for Plaintiff CURRADO MALASPINA 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 14 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 15 16 17 ORPHIC LLC, A California limited liability company; and CURRADO MALASPINA, an individual; 20 21 22 23 The Honorable Dean D. Pregerson Plaintiffs, 18 19 Case No. CV 14-09471-DDP (PLAx) v. MASSIMO NOCERNIO a/k/a MAX NOCE, an individual; BRITTNEY HASTINGS, an individual; NOCE, LLC, a California limited liability company; and DOES 1-25, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE Defendants. 24 25 and related Cross-complaint. 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE ORDER 1 2 Pursuant to a stipulation entered by the parties and good cause appearing 3 therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint and Cross-Complaint in this 4 action are dismissed, with prejudice, with each side to bear its own costs and 5 attorney’s fees. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action for purposes of 6 enforcing the Settlement Agreement entered into between the parties. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA 90210 EISNER JAFFE 9601 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 700 10 Dated: June 21, 2016 11 12 By: Hon. Dean D. Pregerson Judge of United States District Court Central District of California 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?