Orphic LLC et al vs. Massimo Nocerino et al.
Filing
58
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Pursuant to a stipulation 57 entered by the parties and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint and Cross-Complaint in this action are dismiss ed, with prejudice, with each side to bear its own costs and attorneys fees. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action for purposes of enforcing the Settlement Agreement entered into between the parties. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (vv)
5
Carole E. Handler (SBN 129381)
chandler@eisnerlaw.com
Kathleen Cerniglia Hipps (SBN 268019)
Brianna Dahlberg (SBN 280711)
bdahlberg@eisnerlaw.com
EISNER JAFFE
9601 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 700
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Telephone: (310) 855-3200
Facsimile: (310) 855-3201
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff, ORPHIC LLC
7
Elizabeth A. Bell (State Bar No. 205868)
ebell@elbelaw.com
8335 Sunset Boulevard, Suite 221
Los Angeles, CA 90069
Telephone: (323) 306-4077
Fax: (323) 656-1396
1
2
3
4
8
9
BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA 90210
EISNER JAFFE
9601 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 700
10
11
JS-6
Attorney for Plaintiff
CURRADO MALASPINA
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
14
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
15
16
17
ORPHIC LLC, A California limited
liability company; and CURRADO
MALASPINA, an individual;
20
21
22
23
The Honorable Dean D. Pregerson
Plaintiffs,
18
19
Case No. CV 14-09471-DDP (PLAx)
v.
MASSIMO NOCERNIO a/k/a MAX
NOCE, an individual; BRITTNEY
HASTINGS, an individual; NOCE,
LLC, a California limited liability
company; and DOES 1-25,
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE
Defendants.
24
25
and related Cross-complaint.
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
ORDER
1
2
Pursuant to a stipulation entered by the parties and good cause appearing
3
therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint and Cross-Complaint in this
4
action are dismissed, with prejudice, with each side to bear its own costs and
5
attorney’s fees. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action for purposes of
6
enforcing the Settlement Agreement entered into between the parties.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA 90210
EISNER JAFFE
9601 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 700
10
Dated: June 21, 2016
11
12
By:
Hon. Dean D. Pregerson
Judge of United States District Court
Central District of California
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?