Ellen Catherine Rozario v. Kim Richard et al

Filing 85

AMENDED JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: This action came on before this Court after mandate by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 82 . On remand, this Court was instructed to recalculate the amount of Plaintiff's emot ional distress damages in light of the Ninth Circuit's ruling as well as the evidence in the record. The Court hereby AMENDS the default judgment 59 pursuant to the mandate of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Plaintiff is AWARDED general da mages in the amount of $59,083.53 and a judgment in favor of Plaintiff Ellen Catherine Rozario is hereby entered in the amount of $59,083.53. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Kim Richards pay to Plaintiff Ellen Catherine Rozario a total of $59,083.53. (gk)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: 2:14-cv-09540 AB (JPRx) ELLEN CATHERINE ROZARIO, ) an Individual, ) ) v. ) ) KIM RICHARDS, ) an Individual. ) ) AMENDED JUDGMENT ) This action came on before this Court after mandate by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [Dkt. No. 82]. On remand, this Court was instructed to recalculate the amount of Plaintiff’s emotional distress damages in light of the Ninth Circuit’s ruling as well as the evidence in the record. The Court subsequently entered an Order Amending Default Judgment on August 24, 2017 [Dkt. No. 83]. The Court hereby AMENDS the default judgment pursuant to the mandate of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Plaintiff is AWARDED general damages in the amount of $59,083.53 and a judgment in favor of Plaintiff Ellen Catherine Rozario is hereby entered in the amount of $59,083.53. -1- It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Kim Richards pay to Plaintiff Ellen Catherine Rozario a total of $59,083.53. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 14th day of September, 2017. ___________________________ ANDRE BIROTTÉ JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE   -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?