Gregory Denton v. WorleyParsons Group, Inc. et al
Filing
29
JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, in favor of Gregory Denton against WorleyParsons Group, Inc: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: 1. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Gregory Denton in the amount of $864,132, plus the reinstatement of 3668 shares. 2. Of the monetary award, $529,795 shall be taxed as wages. 3. Neither party shall have any right to recover attorneys' fees or costs for any actions up through the date Judgment is entered. (bm)
FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
NANCY YAFFE(SBN 179368)
2 NYaffe@FoxRothschild.com
SADAF BATHAEE(SBN 276096)
3 SBathaee@Fo~othschild.com
1800 Century Park East, Suite 300
4 Los Angeles, CA 90067-1506
Telephone: (310)598-4150
5 Facsimile: (310)556-9828
1
6
E-EiL~D
-3201T
~ument#______
Attorneys for Defendant
WORLEYPARSONS GROUP,INC.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Case No. 2:14-CV-09573-PSG-MRW
RY DENTON,
JUDGMENT
Plaintiff,
Ctrm:
Judge:
v.
880
Philip S. Gutierrez
ORLEYPARSONS GROUP,INC., an
zstralian Corporation, registered in
;
laware conducting business in
ilifornia; CHRISTOPHER PARKER, an
iividual, DENISE SCIBECK, an
3ividual; ANDREW WOODS,an
iividual; STUART BRADIE, an
iividual; IAN WILKINSON, an
iividual and DOES 1-50, inclusive, ,
19
Defendant.
2
0
21
2
2
2
3
2
4
2
5
2
6
2
7
2
8
1
JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 2:14-CV-09573-PSG-MRW
ACTIVE~4~4346162.v4-2/16/17
Whereas, on February 7, 2017, the Court issued an Order Granting Motion
1
2
to Confirm Arbitration Award ("Order") and ordered Defendant to prepare a
3
judgment consistent with the Order ("Judgment")(Dkt. #27);
4
5
Whereas, a copy of the Arbitration Agreement was filed on December 22,
2014(Dkt. #10-3, Exh. B, page 48);
6
Whereas, the Order indicates that pre-award interest as provided in the
'
7
Arbitrator's Final Award (Dkt. #22, Exh. C, Corrected Final Award) shall be
g
calculated on damages for items 1 (base salary), 3(combined incentive plan), 6
9
(car allowance), and 11 (payroll banking);
Whereas, the Order further indicates that once the Award is calculated,
10
11
Plaintiff is then further entitled to post-award, prejudgment interest from
12
September 26, 2016 until the date this Court enters judgment;
Whereas, the damages including prejudgment interest up through February
13
14
13, 2017 total $864,132;
15
16
Whereas Plaintiff is also awarded reinstatement of 3668 shares as specified
in the Final Award (Dkt. 22, Exh. C);
17
18
Whereas, the Order further indicates that the wage portions of the Final
Award are subject to withholding when the Judgment is paid;
19
Whereas the wage portions of the Final Award include: base salary
2
0
($610,451), bonuses and raises ($17,774), and combined incentive money
21
($91,734), totaling $719,959; less mitigated wages of $190,164($140,408 +
2
2
$32,756 + $17,000); for a total of $529,795;
2
3
Whereas, Plaintiff shall be entitled to post-judgment interest at the rate of
2
4
10% per year on the total Award of $864,132, from February 14, 2017 (the date
2
5
that prejudgment interest ceased accruing based on calculations attached to
2
6
Defendant's Opposition, Dkt. 25-10, Exh. I) until the date Judgment is satisfied;
2
7
Whereas, in all other respects the Final Award is affirmed, and Plaintiff's
2
8
request for attorneys' fees is denied.
2
JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 2:14-CV-09573-PSG-MRW
ACTIVE~44346162.v4-2/16/17
~vuiQ~r n
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:
2
1.
3
Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Gregory Denton in the
amount of $864,132, plus the reinstatement of 3668 shares.
4
2.
Of the monetary award, $529,795 shall be taxed as wages.
5
3.
Neither party shall have any right to recover attorneys' fees or costs
for any actions up through the date Judgment is entered.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
10
~.L
Dated: ~30
11
The Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez
United States District Court Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2
0
21
2
2
2
3
4
2
2
5
2
6
2
7
2
8
3
JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 2:14-CV-09573-PSG-MRW
ACTIVEW4346162.v4-2/16/17
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?