U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Stacia Trimmer et al

Filing 19

ORDER COMPELLING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT FURTHER EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF RECOVERY OF ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: U.S. Bank to submit a detailed accounting of U.S.Banks attorneys fees and costs incurred in filing its Motion to Rem and. If U.S. Bank fails to provide the requested evidence by Wednesday, April 1, 2015, the Court will deny Plaintiffs recovery of attorneys fees and costs in the Courts forthcoming order ruling on Plaintiffs Motion to Remand. (lc). Modified on 3/25/2015. (lc).

O

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

United States District Court
Central District of California

8
9
10
11

U.S. BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR

12

SERVERTIS REO PASS-THROUGH

13

TRUST I,

Case № 2:14-cv-09766-ODW-AS

Plaintiff,

14
15

ORDER COMPELLING PLAINTIFF

v.

TO SUBMIT FURTHER EVIDENCE
IN SUPPORT OF RECOVERY OF

16

STACIA TRIMMER, DARRYL JONES

17

AND Does Occupants 1 through 10,

18

ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS

Defendants.

19

On March 20, 2012, U.S. Bank N.A., as Trustee for SerVertis REO Pass-

20

Through Trust I (“U.S. Bank”), filed suit in Los Angeles Superior Court for Unlawful

21

Detainer against Stacia Trimmer and Darryl Jones.

22

December 22, 2014, Mary Jones filed a Notice of Removal to United States District

23

Court, Central District of California. (ECF No. 1.) U.S. Bank subsequently filed a

24

Notice of Motion and Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 10.)

(ECF No. 1, Ex. A.)

On

25

The evidence provided by U.S. Bank in support of its Motion to Remand is

26

insufficient to award attorney fees and costs incurred in filing its Motion because it

27

fails to provide an amount and adequate documentation of its entitlement for recovery.

28

Therefore, the Court ORDERS U.S. Bank to submit a detailed accounting of U.S.

1

Bank’s attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in filing its Motion to Remand.

2

If U.S. Bank fails to provide the requested evidence by Wednesday, April 1,

3

2015, the Court will deny Plaintiff’s recovery of attorneys’ fees and costs in the

4

Court’s forthcoming order ruling on Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

March 25, 2015

7
8
9
10

____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2