Jose Romo et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA et al

Filing 16

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge Manuel L. Real: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: The Complaint is dismissed, as to all parties and all causes of action, with prejudice. Judgment is entered in favor of defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. Plaintiffs, Jose Romo and Nadia Romo shall recover nothing in this action from defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. (gk)

Download PDF
closed 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 10 CASE NO.: 2:14-cv-09831-R-FFM 11 JOSE ROMO and NADIA ROMO; Plaintiff, 12 JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL v. 13 14 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.;NDEX WEST LLC and DOES 1 to 20, 15 Inclusive, 16 Defendants. [Assigned to the Hon. Manuel L. Real] 17 18 On February 18, 2015, the Court entered an Order granting the Motion to 19 20 Dismiss Complaint, filed by defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., successor 21 by merger with Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A., f/k/a Wachovia Mortgage, 22 FSB, f/k/a World Savings Bank, FSB (“Wells Fargo”), dismissing the Complaint, 23 in its entirety, with prejudice. 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 93000/FR1494/01083792-1 1 CASE NO.: 2:14-CV-09831-R-FFM [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 1 Accordingly: 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 3 1. The Complaint is dismissed, as to all parties and all causes of action, 4 with prejudice; 5 2. Judgment is entered in favor of defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, 6 N.A.; and; 7 3. Plaintiffs, Jose Romo and Nadia Romo shall recover nothing in this 8 action from defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 9 10 11 12 DATED: April 14, 2015 HON. MANUEL L. REAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 93000/FR1494/01083792-1 2 CASE NO.: 2:14-CV-09831-R-FFM [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I, the undersigned, declare that I am over the age of 18 and am not a party to 3 this action. I am employed in the City of Pasadena, California; my business address is Anglin, Flewelling, Rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten LLP, 199 S. Los 4 Robles Avenue, Suite 600, Pasadena, California 91101-2459. 5 On the date below, I served a copy of the foregoing document entitled: 6 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 7 on the interested parties in said case as follows: 8 Served Electronically Via the Court’s CM/ECF System: 9 10 Counsel for Defendant NDeX West 11 Edward A. Treder, Esq. James T. Lee, Esq. BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TREDER & WEISS, LLP 20955 Pathfinder Road, Suite 300 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 T: (626) 915-5714 | F: (909) 595-7640 Email: edwardt@bdfgroup.com Email: jamesl@bdfgroup.com 12 13 14 15 16 17 Served by Means Other Than Electronically Via the Court’s CM/ECF System: 18 19 Counsel for Plaintiffs Jose Romo and Nadia Romo 20 21 Robyn L. Pool, Esq. POOL LAW GROUP 3633 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite 550 Ontario, CA 91764 Tel: 909.509-4304 | Fax: 909.906-3041 22 23 24 25 26 27 28  BY MAIL: I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence by mailing. Under that same practice it would be deposited with U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage fully prepaid at Pasadena, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. 93000/FR1494/01083792-1 CASE NO.: 2:14-CV-09831-R-FFM CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. I declare that I am employed in 2 the office of a member of the Bar of this Court, at whose direction the service 3 was made. This declaration is executed in Pasadena, California on February 19, 2015. 4 /s/ Lina Velasquez Lina Velasquez 5 (Type or Print Name) (Signature of Declarant) 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 93000/FR1494/01083792-1 CASE NO.: 2:14-CV-09831-R-FFM CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?