Jose Romo et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA et al
Filing
16
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge Manuel L. Real: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: The Complaint is dismissed, as to all parties and all causes of action, with prejudice. Judgment is entered in favor of defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. Plaintiffs, Jose Romo and Nadia Romo shall recover nothing in this action from defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. (gk)
closed
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION
10
CASE NO.: 2:14-cv-09831-R-FFM
11 JOSE ROMO and NADIA ROMO;
Plaintiff,
12
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
v.
13
14 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.;NDEX
WEST LLC and DOES 1 to 20,
15 Inclusive,
16
Defendants.
[Assigned to the Hon. Manuel L. Real]
17
18
On February 18, 2015, the Court entered an Order granting the Motion to
19
20 Dismiss Complaint, filed by defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., successor
21 by merger with Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A., f/k/a Wachovia Mortgage,
22 FSB, f/k/a World Savings Bank, FSB (“Wells Fargo”), dismissing the Complaint,
23 in its entirety, with prejudice.
24 / / /
25 / / /
26 / / /
27 / / /
28 / / /
93000/FR1494/01083792-1
1
CASE NO.: 2:14-CV-09831-R-FFM
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
1
Accordingly:
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
3
1.
The Complaint is dismissed, as to all parties and all causes of action,
4 with prejudice;
5
2.
Judgment is entered in favor of defendant WELLS FARGO BANK,
6 N.A.; and;
7
3.
Plaintiffs, Jose Romo and Nadia Romo shall recover nothing in this
8 action from defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
9
10
11
12 DATED: April 14, 2015
HON. MANUEL L. REAL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
93000/FR1494/01083792-1
2
CASE NO.: 2:14-CV-09831-R-FFM
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I, the undersigned, declare that I am over the age of 18 and am not a party to
3 this action. I am employed in the City of Pasadena, California; my business
address is Anglin, Flewelling, Rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten LLP, 199 S. Los
4 Robles Avenue, Suite 600, Pasadena, California 91101-2459.
5
On the date below, I served a copy of the foregoing document entitled:
6
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
7
on the interested parties in said case as follows:
8
Served Electronically Via the Court’s CM/ECF System:
9
10
Counsel for Defendant
NDeX West
11
Edward A. Treder, Esq.
James T. Lee, Esq.
BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER
TREDER & WEISS, LLP
20955 Pathfinder Road, Suite 300
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
T: (626) 915-5714 | F: (909) 595-7640
Email: edwardt@bdfgroup.com
Email: jamesl@bdfgroup.com
12
13
14
15
16
17
Served by Means Other Than Electronically
Via the Court’s CM/ECF System:
18
19
Counsel for Plaintiffs
Jose Romo and Nadia Romo
20
21
Robyn L. Pool, Esq.
POOL LAW GROUP
3633 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite 550
Ontario, CA 91764
Tel: 909.509-4304 | Fax: 909.906-3041
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BY MAIL: I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice of collection and
processing correspondence by mailing. Under that same practice it would
be deposited with U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage fully
prepaid at Pasadena, California in the ordinary course of business. I am
aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if
postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after
date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.
93000/FR1494/01083792-1
CASE NO.: 2:14-CV-09831-R-FFM
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
America that the foregoing is true and correct. I declare that I am employed in
2 the office of a member of the Bar of this Court, at whose direction the service
3 was made. This declaration is executed in Pasadena, California on February 19,
2015.
4
/s/ Lina Velasquez
Lina Velasquez
5
(Type or Print Name)
(Signature of Declarant)
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
93000/FR1494/01083792-1
CASE NO.: 2:14-CV-09831-R-FFM
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?