Shirley Lindsay v. A-Can, LLC et al

Filing 40

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Related to: Order on Motion for Summary Judgment 37 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ah)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Shirley Lindsay, Case: 2:14-CV-09888-RGK-PLA Plaintiff, v. [Proposed] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT A-Can, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company; and Juzer Saifee, Defendants. 17 18 Upon review of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and the 19 documents and exhibits filed therewith, the court finds that the Plaintiff has 20 provided the facts necessary to establish that a violation under the Americans 21 with Disabilities Act has occurred, and is entitled to an injunction, as well as 22 damages under the California Unruh Civil Rights Act. Therefore, after 23 consideration of the briefs and arguments of counsel, and all other matters 24 presented to the Court, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for 25 summary judgment is GRANTED. 26 Plaintiff is entitled to: 27 28 1. An Order from the Court directing defendants to provide accessible parking; 28 C.F.R. § 36.211(a); and 1 [proposed] ORDER Case No. 2:14-CV-09719-AB-ASX 1 2 2. A single statutory penalty in the amount of $4,000 for her encounter of the parking barrier. Cal. Civ. Code § 55.56. 3 4 5 Dated: March 2, 2016 By: GARY R. KLAUSNER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [proposed] ORDER Case No. 2:14-CV-09719-AB-ASX

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?