Shirley Lindsay v. A-Can, LLC et al
Filing
40
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Related to: Order on Motion for Summary Judgment 37 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ah)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Shirley Lindsay,
Case: 2:14-CV-09888-RGK-PLA
Plaintiff,
v.
[Proposed] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
A-Can, LLC, a California Limited
Liability Company; and
Juzer Saifee,
Defendants.
17
18
Upon review of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and the
19
documents and exhibits filed therewith, the court finds that the Plaintiff has
20
provided the facts necessary to establish that a violation under the Americans
21
with Disabilities Act has occurred, and is entitled to an injunction, as well as
22
damages under the California Unruh Civil Rights Act. Therefore, after
23
consideration of the briefs and arguments of counsel, and all other matters
24
presented to the Court, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for
25
summary judgment is GRANTED.
26
Plaintiff is entitled to:
27
28
1. An Order from the Court directing defendants to provide accessible
parking; 28 C.F.R. § 36.211(a); and
1
[proposed] ORDER
Case No. 2:14-CV-09719-AB-ASX
1
2
2. A single statutory penalty in the amount of $4,000 for her encounter of
the parking barrier. Cal. Civ. Code § 55.56.
3
4
5
Dated: March 2, 2016
By:
GARY R. KLAUSNER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[proposed] ORDER
Case No. 2:14-CV-09719-AB-ASX
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?