Robert Jaffee et al v. Rudolph Carryl et al

Filing 18

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND 17 AND SETTING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiffs shall file their First Amended Complaint as a stand-alone document within fourteen days of this Order.The Court also ord ers Plaintiffs to show cause, in writing, no later than February 8, 2016, why Defendants have not been served with the First Amended Complaint. No hearing will be held. The Court will discharge this order upon the filing of a proof of service of summons as to each defendant named in this action. (lc). Modified on 1/6/2016 (lc).

O

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

United States District Court
Central District of California

8
9
10
11

ROBERT JAFFEE; BARBARA JAFFEE,
Plaintiffs,

12
13
14
15
16

v.
RUDOLPH CARRYL aka RUDY
CARRYL; CARRYL CAPITAL
MANAGEMENT, LLC; and DOES 1-20,
inclusive,

Case № 2:15-cv-00113-ODW (ASx)
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
[17] AND SETTING ORDER TO
SHOW CAUSE

Defendants.

17
18

On December 22, 2015, Plaintiffs Robert Jaffee and Barbara Jaffee moved for

19

leave to file a First Amended Complaint, proposing to add several new defendants and

20

claims to this action. (ECF No. 17.) The Motion is set for hearing on January 25,

21

2015. To date, no parties have appeared in the action, and no opposition to the

22

Motion has been timely filed. See C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-9, 7-12.

23

After carefully considering the moving papers, the Court deems the matter

24

appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. L.R.

25

7-15. Based on the moving papers, Plaintiffs have shown good cause to amend the

26

complaint pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2) and Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178 (1962). Thus,

27

the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion. (ECF No. 17.) Plaintiffs shall file their First

28

Amended Complaint as a stand-alone document within fourteen days of this Order.

1

C.D. Cal. L.R. 15-1.

2

The Court also orders Plaintiffs to show cause, in writing, no later than

3

February 8, 2016, why Defendants have not been served with the First Amended

4

Complaint. No hearing will be held. The Court will discharge this order upon the

5

filing of a proof of service of summons as to each defendant named in this action.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9

January 6, 2016

10
11
12
13

____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2