APL Co. Pte., Ltd. et al v. Mega Shipping, Inc. et al

Filing 25

ORDER VACATING MOTION TO STRIKE AND MOTION TO DISMISS 9 , 10 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The meet-and-confer provision is not optional. The court therefore VACATES both motions. Mega Shipping is free to re-file the motions inconformity with the Local Rules. (lc) Modified on 4/2/2015. (lc).

Download PDF
1 2 O 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 APL CO. PTE., LTD., a corporation, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 16 MEGA SHIPPING, INC., a corporation; KPJ ENTERPRISE, INC., a corporation; and PHILIP MOO SHIANG LEE, an individual, 17 18 Defendants. ___________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 15-00222 DDP (Ex) ORDER VACATING MOTION TO STRIKE AND MOTION TO DISMISS [Dkt. Nos. 9, 10] 19 20 Defendant Mega Shipping moves to strike or dismiss claims 21 against it in this action. 22 parties agree that Mega Shipping has not met and conferred with 23 opposing counsel as required under Local Rule 7-3. 24 ISO Mot. Dismiss at 5:13-22.) 25 relevant here, that rule instructs that (Dkt. Nos. 9, 10.) However, the (E.g., Reply Subject to some exceptions not 26 [C]ounsel contemplating the filing of any motion shall first 27 contact opposing counsel to discuss thoroughly, preferably in 28 person, the substance of the contemplated motion and any 1 potential resolution. The conference shall take place at least 2 seven (7) days prior to the filing of the motion. 3 4 L.R. 7-3 (emphases added). As the emphasized language makes clear, the meet-and-confer 5 provision is not optional. The court therefore VACATES both 6 motions. 7 conformity with the Local Rules. Mega Shipping is free to re-file the motions in 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 Dated: April 2, 2015 DEAN D. PREGERSON United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?