Chris Langer v. Michael H. Miller et al
Filing
41
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF MOTION (1) COMPELLING INITIAL RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS; (2) COMPELLING INITIAL RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES; (3) SEEKING RULE 37 SANCTIONS (Docket No. 39 ) by M agistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Accordingly, the Court issues an Order to Show Cause why it should not grant the Motion, including the imposition of sanctions, and orders Defendants to respond by January 25, 2016. The hearing on the Motion scheduled for January 27, 2016 is hereby vacated. (See Order for Further Details) (kl)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
CV 15-00275-AB (JEMx)
Title
Chris Langer v. Michael H. Miller, et al.
Present: The
Honorable
Date
January 14, 2016
JOHN E. MCDERMOTT, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
S. Anthony
Deputy Clerk
Proceedings:
Court Reporter / Recorder
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF
MOTION (1) COMPELLING INITIAL RESPONSES TO
REQUESTS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS;
(2) COMPELLING INITIAL RESPONSES TO
INTERROGATORIES; (3) SEEKING RULE 37 SANCTIONS
(Docket No. 39)
Before the Court is a Notice of Motion Compelling Responses to Interrogatories and Requests
for Production of Documents and for Sanctions (“Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Chris Langer against
Defendants Michael H. Miller, Mark Everett Miller, Melinda Miller and Rupee Enterprise. Plaintiff
asserts that Defendants have not responded to his discovery requests nor to his attempt to meet and
confer. Defendants also have not filed any opposition or response to his Motion.
Accordingly, the Court issues an Order to Show Cause why it should not grant the Motion,
including the imposition of sanctions, and orders Defendants to respond by January 25, 2016.
The hearing on the Motion scheduled for January 27, 2016 is hereby vacated.
cc: Parties
:
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (10/08)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
sa
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?